We are running XP. It happened on my machine, luckily we did not install it on any other machines.
Hello,
The issue that you are running into, with not being able to launch ArcReader after double-clicking on a PMF in Windows Explorer, is a known Software Defect that was introduced with the File Menu Performance Patch after Service Pack 3. Being that you have installed Service Pack 4, that patch was now part of that install rather then a separate patch so that is why the issue is still apparent. This issue is not reproducible in 10.1
As another workaround, right-clicked on the PMF and go to 'Open With' > 'Choose Default Program' > Browse > C:\Program Files (x86)\ArcGIS\ArcReader10.0\bin\ArcReader.exe > 'Open' > OK.
ArcReader was now set to be the default program to always open the PMF file type, thus the file association was changed from the ArcgisfileHandler.exe
Thank you.
I am also having a wonderful time with my distilled ArcReader packages!!! I recently went straight from 9.3.1 to 10.0 SP4.
Having trouble digesting/understanding "installed Service Pack 4, that patch was now part of that install rather then a separate patch so that is why the issue is still apparent."
How can I avoid my users having bad shortcuts on thier desktops?? Should I only install ArcReader 10 on thiers, maybe SP 3 or no service pack(s)??? These users don't have the full software(s) as I do, so will they still have to manually associate?. Not sure if they will even encounter the same ArcgisfileHandler.exe issues?
Thanks!!!!
Morgan,
We have not installed any service packs on our ArcReader installations. The issues addressed with the service packs seem to be all geoprocessing related, which can't be done in Arcreader. So if they don't have ArcMap on their machine just do a basic ArcReader 10 install. If they do have ArcMap I would do Service pack 3 on ArcMap/ArcView only.
Thanks, but I'm wondering why there are 4 specific Service Packs solely for ArcReader?? I thought if the published/distilled product was created in 10.0 SP 4 then ArcReader would do better with its' SP 4???
On a related note my ArcReader products seem to be running slower, spooling and spooling waiting for online imagery and I imagine the bigger/complex polygon layers like the Wetlands to finally draw. Seems to have to draw more than what is in current extent??
Appreciate the help..