Select to view content in your preferred language

Raster calculator "if, then, else" statement

12505
3
06-02-2019 11:33 PM
KK2
by
Occasional Contributor

Does anyone know if in Raster Calculator it is possible to build more complex condition than with the Con tool?

I would like to create a new column in my attribute table and evaluate the values in this column based on few different columns, e.g:

if value in column A > 50 give me A, then 

if value in column B > 50 give me B, then 

if value in column C > 50 give me C, then

if value in column D > 50 give me D, else

give me E

Any idea how to do this as one statement in Raster Calculator? Thanks in advance for your answers.

0 Kudos
3 Replies
by Anonymous User
Not applicable

Hello,

If you're working with a raster with an attribute table (and it sounds like you are), a better tool might be the Field Calculator, which can incorporate python scripts to process if/else statements. Here's some of the documentation on this:

Fundamentals of Field Calculations - http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/manage-data/tables/fundamentals-of-field-calculations.htm...

Calculate Field - http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/data-management-toolbox/calculate-field.htm

I don't think there's a way to do this with the Con tool, but maybe others here will have other ideas! 

Best,

Lauren

KevinMayall
Frequent Contributor
0 Kudos
curtvprice
MVP Esteemed Contributor

Reclassify won't work for this as it reclassifies the data in a single value field.

I agree with Lauren that working with Calculate Field in the raster table may be (much) more efficient, but I'm wondering how you got such a "fat" raster table. If the fat table was output from the Combine tool, you may want to skip the Combine tool and do this instead using the five input rasters:

Con("RasterA" > 50, "RasterA", 
    Con("RasterB" > 50, "RasterB", 
    Con("RasterC" > 50, "RasterC",
    Con("RasterD" > 50, "RasterD", 
    "RasterE"))))
 ‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍
0 Kudos