I'm very familiar with using the intersect tool with shapefiles/geodatabases. I have two rasters that I'd like to do the same with. It would be super helpful if someone could point me toward a tool that would do this. Basically, raster 1 has values ranging from 1-10 and raster 2 has values ranging from A-E. I want to be able to create a new raster that tells me for example how many acres have a value of 1 that overlap with value A. Any suggestions are much appreciated!
Erik
You could either convert both rasters to shape files and do an intersect, or be a little creative with raster math. Resample the second raster to values in increments of 25 say, and then add the 2 rasters together. The "intersect " would be raster values 26, 51, 76, etc.
I believe Tabulate Area will do this for you.
If Tabulate Areas doesn't yield the format you require and each combination needs to be on a single record, you can use Combine—Help | ArcGIS for Desktop . This will yield a new raster with the combinations and the attribute table can be used to define the areas (count * pixelsize)
hmmm, the suggestions are close but not exactly the right fit for what I'm trying to do (or it's possible I'm not understanding the suggested tools).
- I tried converting to a shape file and intersecting. Files are too big, never finishes.
- Here's a more thorough explanation of what I'm trying to do. Grid 1 represents all of the counties in Oregon, about 30. Grid two represents a range of values corresponding to how much biomass is stored per acre. I am trying to figure out how much biomass is stored in each county.
- With regard to tabulate area - if you look at the illustration at the link provided above, what I'd like to calculate is for example to look at all of the boxes with 1 as the value in the left box and know what the total values added up in the corresponding 2nd box are that have a 1 in the first box. So the final table would have a field for value, and the first record would be 1 and the the second field would be total and would equal 55. Above real example might be easier to follow.
Again, thank you for the suggestions.
In that case, quite different description than the original btw, you should look into Zonal Statistics, SUM. You may find it easier to create a new raster with absolute values of biomass per pixel, rather than adding biomass per acre, but it's up to you.