Service area maps highlight some of the most important spatial decisions in public policy and planning. Which hospital an ambulance is dispatched to, which school a child is assigned to, which distribution center serves a region’s inventory needs—getting these zones right is crucial. They shape how resources reach people. With standard Voronoi diagrams, you can create these boundaries. Standard Voronoi diagrams partition space by assigning each location to its nearest point. They are fast, deterministic, and a reasonable starting point. But the embedded assumption is that all points are equal. In reality, that may not be the case.
In the following example from Cook County, Illinois, there are 60 licensed hospital facilities serving over 5.1 million people. A community clinic on the south side of Chicago has 60 licensed beds. A Level I trauma center 11 kilometers north has 894 beds. On a standard Voronoi diagram, both facilities have roughly equal territory. A service area model that treats them as such is leaving meaningful information out of the geometry. However, that information is exactly what planners, analysts, and decision-makers need.
Standard Voronoi diagram created with the Unweighted Voronoi type (left) and custom expression Voronoi diagram (right) created considering bed counts as weights and network access as coefficients
Standard Voronoi diagrams only factor in the location of each facility. The attributes associated with the feature class have no influence on the zone geometry. The boundary falls at the geographic midpoint regardless of what the data says about each side of it. The Generate Weighted Voronoi tool works by incorporating the attributes. These attributes should shape where the zone boundary sits. A regional medical center with 894 licensed beds should draw its boundary further from a neighboring clinic than a straight midpoint would place it. The zone should reflect the data.
The tool supports five zone Voronoi types in computing the service area, available as options on the tool’s Voronoi Type drop-down menu:
For the Cook County case study, the Weight Field value is the number of licensed beds, and the Coefficient Field value is the facility tier weight that encodes road network reachability and bed use per provider. The expression used here is:
Here, the distance is the straight-line distance from the provider. Weight (w) is the licensed beds. The exponent for the w equals 0.625. The coefficient k then scales the zone by use. A facility with twice the bed count and twice the visit volume does not get twice the zone. The combined denominator grows much faster, reflecting how capacity and demand compound each other. The result is a geometry that responds to both what a facility can hold and how much it is actually used.
The weighted zone output is a geometric framework. It becomes useful when this geometry is connected to the population it is designed to serve. This analysis answers the most common question planners and policymakers ask: given these weighted assignments, is the distribution of responsibility proportionate to the capacity available?
You can calculate this by completing the following steps:
The result shows which census tracts are currently undersupply compared to the demand.
Populations per bed per provider in Cook County, Illinois, calculated using the custom expression in the Generate Weighted Voronoi tool
That calculate ratio—population per licensed bed—is new information. The population data was always there. The bed counts were always there. The Generate Weighted Voronoi tool provided the geometric framework that connected them: a zone structure that allocates population to facilities based on what those facilities can actually support. That number can support a certificate-of-need filing, strengthen a grant application, or inform a capital investment decision about where new capacity is most needed. It is the kind of evidence that moves planning conversations forward.
The analysis uses three datasets. The hospital point feature class is sourced from the IDPH Hospital Licensure Database (2023), cross-referenced with the CMS Provider of Services File for bed counts and annual visit volume. Cook County census tract boundaries and population estimates are from US Census TIGER/Line 2022 and ACS 2022 5-year estimates. All layers were projected to Illinois State Plane East (FIPS 1201, meters) before running the tool.
Service area analysis has always depended on geometry. The Generate Weighted Voronoi tool extends that geometry so it also incorporates the attributes that describe what each facility in the input point layer can actually do. The workflow described in this article uses hospital service areas as the example, but the expression adapts to any weighted point dataset. Swap the number of licensed beds for annual revenue, student enrollment, or unit response capacity. Swap the coefficient field used here for any site-specific coefficient that the data supports—for example, incident rate, use ratio, or demand index. The five zone types provide a range of analytical options from simple to highly customized.
Whether you are a public health analyst, an emergency management planner, or a regional equity researcher, the Generate Weighted Voronoi tool allows you to build service areas that more accurately reflect the facilities they represent.
The original blog was first published in the ArcGIS Blog, and can be found here:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.