@Scott_Harris @JoshuaBixby
Item1: Lodged as an idea by others in 2022 (IIRC) and also filed as a bug with local reseller (who thinks it is an enhancement request). Rename a FC in FGDB and Alias is updated. Paste Special and rename copied FC = Alias not changed? Consistency much?
Item 2: If a bug gets stuck with the local monopoly reseller then no public bug nr will be available. Now you know of it as well.
Item 3: To quote Esri Inc:
BUG-000166795 - Undesired additional space when copying a numeric value of a record from the attribute table field popup in ArcGIS Pro 3.2.
Status: Non-Reproducible (Learn More)
Additional Information: Issue is not reproducible in versions 3.1 or higher.
Alternate Solution: Delete the space manually after pasting it anywhere else.
A few things got lost in translation - it occurs for any data type. Local reseller has been able to replicate repeatedly on multiple Pro versions.
4 PDF Issues - nothing lodged yet as it seems some of it overlaps the multitude of 3.4 pdf bugs.
Lagginess in UI - no case lodged yet for this specific behaviour. Only installed it yesterday and will see if there is a pattern I can detect. It's not the hardware spec if anyone is wondering.
Clicking in ribbon or QAT not bringing Pro to the foreground - case lodged with locals.
@Scott_Harris re editing bug.
I use FGDB (95%) & SHP most often. As far as I can tell it is related to having certain types of symbology in a map. I suspected coordinate systems and transformations but that seems to be coincident but unrelated.
It is intermittent - partial behaviour map would be to open a new project, add FC, start editing, things work, save edits, add more data, save project., close Pro, come back ,open Pro, open project, start editing, things work, save edits, save project, start editing, things don't work and likely won't for that project again. Open new project, add data from catalog, start editing, things work, ..... and so it goes.
We have near decades of ArcMap projects & styles that get carried over as clients come back or projects evolve. Working through all of that to find what triggers Pro to hose itself should not be my job. You guys develop it and should know exactly what could trigger specific behaviour. Forcing us to go through local resellers that gatekeep the info you get, again, is not a problem your clients have caused.
Workarounds such as clearing cache etc becomes unworkable very quickly - do I clear cache before every edit session, during editing, after editing? Who pays for the time wasted doing housekeeping that Pro should be able to do itself?
I have had formal feedback on Pro UI lagginess bugs to "work slower"
Leading space bug advice = "Delete the space manually"
These sorts of things are why people still use ArcMap after Pro has been around for a decade.
Yes, I am frustrated.