Arc Pro - Building Stereo Models For 3D Viewing

504
3
12-11-2022 12:23 PM
GregEscott
New Contributor II

Hello,

I am trying to set up a stereo project in ArcPro to test how the built in stereo viewing works.  I have active shutter glasses and my system is functioning.

There are some crude, outdated tutorials, but none that I have found so far get into what is needed to actually set up a project using your own data of stereo imagery, camera files, etc.

In particular, there is not a good source for how to actually build stereo models for use in ArcPro.  I have all of the imagery for a stereo project, including camera and calibration files. 

I use a 3D visualization program called Summit (by DAT/EM systems) to view stereo imagery with active shutter glasses. 

The data I have works just fine for the Summit program from DAT/EM systems, so it is surprising to me how difficult it is to get reliable information to create a similar project setup in ArcPro.  Anyone using 3D imagery would need to know how to do this.

Summit works in conjunction with Arc Desktop and has some support for Arc Pro. 

However, visualization of the stereo imagery is done in Summit, while Arc is used to create or manipulate shape files (no use of built in 3D functions in ArcPro).

My understanding is that ArcPro is not suitable for production work in a 3D environment in a similar way that Summit is, however, I am still quite interested to see the capabilities of ArcPro in a 3D environment. 

Problem is, I can't even get a good tutorial for building the necessary models.  The tutorial from ESRI that I have already comes with pre-built stereo models.  This is not helpful if you need to build your own, which is what is really needed if you want to do this kind of thing.

If anyone has experience in both platforms and knows how to build models with the correct information, I am very much interested in learning from you.

Thank you for your time.

0 Kudos
3 Replies
GregEscott
New Contributor II

Here is some sample data:

Control File:

MTP_00079 HV 570867.0320000000 5550918.2259999998 1765.4650000000 0.0170 0.0180 0.0390 1
MTP_00078 HV 568683.5970000000 5550860.5240000002 1943.5410000000 0.0150 0.0160 0.0300 1
MTP_00077 HV 567931.9660000000 5552559.9079999998 1792.8290000000 0.0160 0.0170 0.0290 1
328 HV 569881.0790000000 5552363.1459999997 1732.0190000000 0.0340 0.0370 0.1000 1
474 HV 569024.5500000001 5555138.3750000000 1905.5640000000 0.0270 0.0350 0.1040 1

 

Camera File:

OWNER: UCEagle-M3
TYPE: UCEagle-M3
SN:
LENS_SN:
DATE: 4/19/2022
FOCAL_LENGTH: 79.761000
FILM_HEIGHT: 105.840000
FILM_WIDTH: 68.016000
PRINCIPAL_POINT: 0.004100 0.000400
NOTES: Conversion from Z/I
DATA_STRIP_LOCATION: 0
IS_DIGITAL: 1
IS_FLIPPED: 0
FOV_USE: 0
FOV_WIDTH: 0.000000
FOV_HEIGHT: 0.000000
CAM_DIGITAL_CAM_ROTATION: 0
CAM_VERSION: 2

Model Report:

Computing RO solutions.
Sigma is in microns.

Model Id: 101157, Iters: 3, Dof: 46, Sigma: 0.03, Num Pts: 51
Model Id: 101158, Iters: 3, Dof: 46, Sigma: 0.03, Num Pts: 51
Model Id: 101159, Iters: 3, Dof: 42, Sigma: 0.03, Num Pts: 47

Photo Measurements:

begin photo_measurements 101157
270477 24.432 50.6547 24.432 50.6547 1
269916 -5.8502 46.2127 -5.8502 46.2127 1
270339 -7.5545 38.1633 -7.5545 38.1633 1

0 Kudos
DanPatterson
MVP Esteemed Contributor

Just to clarify you have tried the tools in the Ortho toolset like...

Arc Pro - Building Stereo Models For 3D Viewing - Esri Community

but you are looking for a walk-through?


... sort of retired...
0 Kudos
GregEscott
New Contributor II

Yes.  I can not find a suitable walkthrough or guide for creating this kind of project with aerial photography.

For example, there are fields like Exterior Orientation File, etc. that do not come with an explanation that is easy to understand.  

Tutorials that I find reference things like imagery taken from a drone with built in GPS data.  I am looking more for a project setup that is typical in the industry, but am not coming up with any solutions.

Perhaps I will have to stick with a dedicated stereo viewing application outside of ArcPro, but I was quite interested to see how the two compared.  Just can't get Arc off the ground...

 

0 Kudos