All too often, people use the Define Projection tool when they really want to use the Project tool, thinking that if they use it, their data will be projected into the coordinate system that they want.
I suggest that the Define Projection tool
The two proposals Initial and Fix projection could call the same code essentially, allowing one to define a coordinate system for which one doesn't exist or to fix one that is incorrect.
With that argument don't you end up needing four tools:
No, my students typically think Define Projection is Project because they think the 'Project tool' is the one they want to use for their project (try a different emphasis on 'project' and you will see. ) Things were much easier when projection on the fly didn't exist...
...which is why I suggested Reproject was a better name.
and then they get into an endless loop because they would say... we didn't project them at all.
As you can see a losing battle until a better warning system is in place.. I have even thought that red-flagging layers in the TOC that differ from that of the data frame (ie map, in Pro) would be useful.
Yes, actually that would be better.
The definition of the two is clear. No need to change.
Still no change in 2021 and the problems persist
We understand that the existing Define Projection tool name can be confusing. Renaming the tool is a point of discussion for our teams. We appreciate the suggestions and votes for this idea.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.