Selecting a feature from “Reviewer Polygons” layer doesn’t select its corresponding record in the “reviewer table”,

[JamalNUMAN]

Selecting a feature from “Reviewer Polygons” layer doesn’t select its corresponding record in the “reviewer table”,

Since the features that need to be reviewed appear in “red” color, then it would be great if one can see what is needed to be performed to these red features (delete, reshape, moe, etc.). Unfortunately, these red polygons are not linked to the “reviewer table” such that one can refer to their corresponding record and update the status.

Thank you

Best

Jamal

[KumarBhardwaj]

Hi Jamal,

Please go through the following webhelp links to get more details about Reviewer table records, symbolizing them on map and how they are related to the feature geometry:

Reviewer geometry versus feature geometry

http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#/Reviewer_geometry_versus_feature_geometry/...

Symbolizing Reviewer table records

http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#/Symbolizing_Reviewer_table_records/0102000...

Selecting feature geometry

http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#/Selecting_feature_geometry/01020000004r000...

Please let me know if you still have some doubts.

Thanks,

Kumar

[JamalNUMAN]

I have attended the “Quality Control Using ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop” course while I’m still confronting the issues I’m reporting in the forum.

The issue in this thread is related to detecting which feature belongs to which record in the “reviewer table”. Selecting a feature will select its corresponding record in the “reviewer polygons” table but not in the “reviewer table”.

[MichelleJohnson]

That is correct Jamal. Selecting the Reviewer geometry (polygon) will not select the related row in the Reviewer Table.

The Reviewer geometries are joined to the Reviewer table records.  You could do an identify on the polygon and view the fields with their values to determine the issue for that feature.

[JamalNUMAN]

Thanks Michelle,

It would be great if the “attribute table” and “reviewer table” are connected somehow together. Having them disconnecting requires much effort to know which (in the attribute table) is which in the (reviewer table).