|
POST
|
I don't know of a usuable workflow to do this in ArcGIS Pro, but I definintely know how to do this in ArcGIS Experience Builder. Perhaps others will chime in with assistance.
... View more
Friday
|
0
|
0
|
962
|
|
POST
|
There are a couple reasons you may see the grayed out button: You aren’t signed in to the active ArcGIS Online/Portal connection in Pro (or you’re signed into a portal that doesn’t allow saving). Your account lacks privileges (most commonly you don’t have permission to create content), so Pro won’t allow saving a web map. See: Problem: Unable to save a web map in ArcGIS Online or Portal for ArcGIS Your map includes content/settings that can’t be saved as a web map (unsupported layers or properties), which disables the command. Review limitations here: Save a web map—ArcGIS Pro 3.6
... View more
Friday
|
1
|
0
|
118
|
|
POST
|
There is no tool in ArcGIS Pro, to my knowledge, that takes a polygon created using the Traverse tool and outputs a line table or legal description. One possible workflow is: 1. Run the Feature to Line GP tool to create a line feature class from the polygon feature class. 2. In the newly created line feature class, add fields such as SEQ (order), Distance, Bearing and perhaps FromX/FromY/ToX/ToY 3. For distance bearing attributes, see the How to article - Determine Bearing for Line Features in ArcGIS Pro 4. Export to CSV if need the standalone table.
... View more
Wednesday
|
1
|
0
|
97
|
|
POST
|
@KoryKramer - does the ArcGIS Pro Dev Team know about this item/issue?
... View more
Wednesday
|
0
|
0
|
42
|
|
POST
|
Another area to explore is the line direction - you could reverse it and see if the label draws better. Reverse the direction of a line—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
... View more
Monday
|
0
|
0
|
86
|
|
POST
|
I know you said not feature extraction but are two new tools coming in ArcGIS Pro 3.7 that will do this workflow. See Raster to polyline extraction - Esri Community for details.
... View more
Monday
|
0
|
1
|
185
|
|
POST
|
Thank you for the response. There's an older Support case about this item that was resolved by the customer disconnecting the locks on their enterprise geodatabase by navigating to the Catalog Pane, right-clicking on the feature class being overwritten, locks and disconnect. Then the customer was able to overwrite the layer.
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
0
|
110
|
|
POST
|
From a Support Services case - "Databricks is not officially supported by Esri, so the interaction between the Databricks platform and ArcGIS applications may be uncertain." And there is an enhancement request July 2025: ENH-000170840 : Add Databricks as a supported cloud data warehouse connection for ArcGIS Pro.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
172
|
|
POST
|
Are you using the workflow as described here - Oriented Imagery in ArcGIS Pro: Create & Publish to ArcGIS Online
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
5
|
305
|
|
POST
|
Questions: what type of geodatabase are you using? File or Enterprise? Also are you using the in_memory workspace at all?
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
2
|
182
|
|
POST
|
@MarkJennings - question - are you still using ArcGIS Pro 2.7.2? 2.7.x was released back in 2020. Since then, there's been a lot of changes and bug fixes. If you're able, I highly recommend a clean uninstall of 2.7.x and a clean install of the current release of ArcGIS Pro. 3.6. ArcGIS Pro 3.7 will be released in the next month or two I suspect.
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
261
|
|
POST
|
This is a known quirk of the ArcGIS Pro SDK for .NET when working with enterprise geodatabases (SDE connections). So what you're seeing is when you use SaveItemDialog against an eGDB, the UI shows correctly - {database}.{schema}.{featureclass} but saveDialog.FilePath only returns {connection_path}\{database}.{schema}. That's because in eGDB's, the dialog treats the container as the path and the feature class name is stored separately, not appended to FilePath. So nothing is broken - it's just split across properties. The fix is combine saveDialog.FilePath and saveDialog.Name
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
1
|
130
|
|
POST
|
In reviewing this item, I found that this expression might work better: var out = null; var dataset = "Dataset2"; // Parse JSON safely var dict = FromJSON(Text($feature.json)); if (IsEmpty(dict)) { return null; } // Check if key exists if (!HasKey(dict, dataset)) { return null; } var arr = dict[dataset]; // Ensure it's a valid array with values if (!IsEmpty(arr) && Count(arr) > 0) { out = Concatenate(arr, ", "); } return out; Why this works better is the HasKey() prevents invalid dictionary access, the IsEmpty avoids null dereferencing, the Count() ensures you're not concatenating an empty array and it removes the DefaultValue(arr, 0) logic which is not reliable for arrays. I don't have the data to test but think it will work.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
0
|
75
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Friday | |
| 1 | Wednesday | |
| 1 | 04-18-2025 08:20 AM | |
| 1 | a month ago | |
| 1 | 04-01-2026 09:09 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Friday
|