Latest Contributions by BrettGovernanti

Thanks Muhammad, I do have the same issue. What kinds of checks are you running? I find that any relationship rules will run on every record in that table despite being zoomed in closely. This may be because once the Reviewer leaves the feature and travels to the relationship to evaluate forward and backward, that it no longer is connected to the view extent and then proceeds to check all related records. I don't know if it's true, but it sure seems like that is what is happening. Do you get the same feeling? Brett ... View more

Muhammad, thank you for the idea to try. I am trying your method. I need to evaluate a large area at present and so cannot tell if your method is working. Let me try again tomorrow on a smaller area and I will respond again with findings. Do you use Data Reviewer in your organization for Quality Control? If so, do you include many rules in your RBJ? Thanks, Brett ... View more

First off, I work in municipal government and the features involved there, utilities, parcels, center lines, addresses, etc.. I have RBJ sets for the various workgroups in our region that update GIS data. Reviewer will function as a QAQC process to evaluate quality of data entering the system as well as to evaluate data currently in the system for data gaps, geometry errors, and general inconsistencies so that a plan for their resolution can ensue.  Reviewer has an option to evaluate the current extent and a checkbox to evaluate only changed features. However, I am seeing that when evaluating a batch job according to current extent with the changed features option checked, Reviewer seems to evaluate items that are outside the current extent. This is frustrating since the amount of time that each RBJ process is taking is far greater than ideal, especially when the only two features were added to address points. And to repeat my comment above, any relationship rule continues to check all records regardless of extent. Has anyone else a found similar issue? @Michelle_Johnson Have you experienced this? Do you have any additional tips for evaluating extent or change features? ... View more

Sorry, I asked my question in the title and got it truncated. 'Current Extent' in Data Reviewer? Reviewer seems like it is checking items outside of the current extent even though I have it checked. Is this because there is a check on a relationship rule in the RBJ and that checks each record in the related table regardless of extent? ... View more

How about any of you map heroes out there? Anyone want to share Data Reviewer templates they've downloaded from the gallery in the past, before the reorganization of the site? Pretty please? ... View more

Thanks. Everything seems like pie when you're getting direction from the Data Reviewer Team at the UC right? Haha. There are not as many resources are out there for those of us still hanging on to 10.0. I'm sorry to see that but will try to see the 10.1 Addressing template from a test computer. I appreciate your quick response. ... View more