POST
|
Hi, I'm having a similar problem as the original poster. While I understand why map projection differences can cause errors, I am trying to measure distances at small scales (300 meters and less) and I am getting massive differences in what ArcMap desktop returns and what I measure on ArcMap Online. I don't understand how differences in measurements (planar, geodesic, etc...) or projections could cause differences in returned values from either platform at these scales. Some examples include a measurement of 434ft in ArcMap desktop (UTM 10N) but 348ft in ArcMap online (20% difference), and an area of 26 acres on desktop and 17 acres online (35% difference). As the original poster also mentioned, the online measurements are probably the correct measurements, so how do I reconfigure ArcMap desktop to give the actual values?
... View more
04-23-2021
12:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1287
|
POST
|
I am trying to sync the points I collected in my map on collector to my ArcGIS online map. However, I get the error: "An error occurred while synchronizing edits. Service = [long website], Unable to synchronize replica., No permission to sync replica. {long string of letters and numbers}" As far as I can tell, I have not published this map in any different manner than other maps which synchronize just fine, though I am not sure how true that really is. My map has 11 point and 1 polygon layers. Only one point layer was edited, as in points taken. The closest related question I can find is here, but I don't understand how to implement this fix. I also don't really understand what a "replica" is in my case. I am the creator and only user of this map, though it was published to my organization and to the public. Since these points are only existing on my local (Android) storage, I cannot delete this map or I will lose everything. Any help would be appreciated. Mike
... View more
11-05-2019
04:43 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1037
|
POST
|
I am trying to set up a Leica GG04 smart antenna running the Leica Zeno Connect software (on my S10+) and using RTK corrections from the California Real Time Network (CRTN). Briefly, I am able to accomplish this and my estimated accuracy is what I would expect for RTK. The maps I upload to ArcGIS online to use in collector are WGS 1984 UTM Zone 10N. My issue is translating this to collector. Using the default location profile (GNSS Receiver Coordinate System = GCS WGS 84, Map system/datum transform = "Determined from current map) appears to work, and RTK level accuracy is reported on my maps. However, they are slightly offset from the ESRI basemaps, and I suspect this is because the coordinates the receiver is getting are actually NAD 1983. If I use anything other than the default location profile, I get the Incorrect Location Profile error, "The map uses a different coordinate system than the location profile." Adjusting the systems of the uploaded maps and the Collector location profile coordinate systems does not make the error go away. (It is also interesting that the default profile settings cannot be replicated in additional location profile settings. As in, one cannot define "GCS WGS 84" as the receiver coordinate system, only "GCS WGS 1984", and the map system and transformation cannot be "Determined from current map") I have specified in Collector settings that the location provider is the Leica Smart Antenna, as well as working through the other steps laid out on the Collector website, though I cannot find what the issue may be. I am using the ESRI basemap, which I have read is defaulted at WGS 1984. My specific questions are: What coordinate system should the Leica Zeno Connect app/software, which is connected to the antenna, be using? Since the datum used by the CRTN is “CSRS Epoch 2017.50 (NAD83).” I imagine I should be using North American 1983. I cannot get more specific than North American 1983 in the Leica Connect app, so I am not sure if that is a problem. Does coordinate system used in the Leica software (the answer to question #1) need to be the exact system specified in the location profile settings of collector under “GNSS receiver coordinate system”? I would think so. In the Collector location profile settings, should “Map coordinate system” reflect the system of the maps I upload to ArcGIS online (WGS 1984 UTM Zone 10N)? Again, based on the ESRI guidelines, I would think so. I also don’t think the specific transformation should matter much, but I may be incorrect in that too. Are the ESRI basemaps the problem? I can remove them but it would make surveying in the field difficult. In general, all I'm trying to do is fix the offset I see when I take a point with RTK and what I see on the basemap. Maybe this isn't really that big of an issue but I want to make sure my location settings are properly dialed in as well. Thanks, and any help would be appreciated. Mike
... View more
10-29-2019
03:41 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1044
|
POST
|
I knew it would be something stupid and simple. I blame excel. Thanks so much!
... View more
10-18-2019
08:19 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1585
|
POST
|
I am working with an XY .txt file of a table of 96 points (originally collected in GCS_WGS_1984). They include lat/long columns, as well as several other data columns of various metadata for each point/row. It was added to my blank map (Map is WGS_1984_UTM_Zone_10N) via "add XY data". While it successfully showed up on the map at the expected scale, it was running ran extremely slow and draw times took 10-15 seconds every time I so much as clicked on the layer in the table of contents, or tried to move the map with the "pan" hand. I then tried projecting it from GCS_1984 to the map's coordinate system (as stated above, 1984_UTM_10N) via the "project" tool and exported it to the geodatabase I created for this map. This still has no alleviating effect and the draw times can still be abysmally slow. The machine I am working on has no shortage of horsepower, but that shouldn't be a problem anyway for a map with only a single point data set associated with it. Working on ArcMap 10.7. What am I missing? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
... View more
10-17-2019
06:41 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1672
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 10-18-2019 08:19 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
04-23-2021
03:15 PM
|