nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Amazon S3 Bucket Data Storage for GDB Attachments

BlairDeaver

In a SaaS deployment of ArcGIS Server I would like to see ESRI leverage Amazon S3 as a storage platform for Geodatabase Attachments for both ArcGIS Server and ArcGIS.com so that I can easily scale while keeping costs manageable. Blob storage works well in a typical Enterprise environment but as more companies are moving to Public and Private Cloud deployments cheaper storage alternatives such as Amazon S3 make sense. Additionally this would be a great feature for Services published to ArcGIS.com which currently does not support attachment functionality.

Trouver plus de publications taguées avec

Status: Ouvrir

Réponses

JackFanZhang

Unbelievable idea for two reasons: 1. this idea was posted on year 2012, when S3 was still very new to most of us 2. I'm still voting for the idea in 2025/2026.

Rejoindre la conversation

Connectez-vous pour publier, suivre le contenu, et plus encore. Nouveau ici ? Inscrivez-vous gratuitement.