nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Map Service and Image Service

FatinRimawi

I have an orthophoto, and i want to publish it.

Is it much better to publish it as map service or image service?

what is the difference between them?

what is the advantages/disadvantages for each type?

Which type has better caching ?

Thank you.

Best,

Fatin

Find more posts tagged with

Accepted answers

All comments

ErwanC

With Mapservice you can use "resampling image" for zooming higher than cache levels. With image service not yet in 10.8.1.

LisaPierce1

Hello _ I am trying to better understand if an image service includes the pixel values , it seems it cannot be used as a raster data model? Other than obtaining the actual raster feature dataset, is there any other way to extract part of a larger image service to use in a model ? I am still unclear with the new "raster" format definition, which is different than a "GRID" raster dataset?

LisaPierce1

AndrewQuee

Thanks, very helpful. Link is now dead, new one appears to be Imagery in Web applications: Should I use a cached map service or an image service?

FatinRimawi

Thank you Rebecca for your replay, i really appreciated that.

RebeccaStrauch__GISP

To add to that, Image Server (or Image Server extension pre 10.5), is an additional license, so that may have to be taken into consideration.

However, even if you end up caching, in my tests, caching of an image service is much faster (~1/8 the time) than caching a map service. Dropping a 8 week cache job to ~10 days, while adding 5 more scales makes it pay for itself, in my opinion. Plus, the Image Server gives you the option to do either.

re: viewing as a basemap. If using a cached service, you will be limited to those scales when creating a web map (ArcMap will interpolate between cache levels/scales). This can work to your advantage if you need to control how users are viewing the maps, but can work against you if you do not have enough scale levels.

These are just my opinions. Results may vary.

FatinRimawi

Thank you Jayanta.

Best,

Fatin

JayantaPoddar

A very good blog on this topic Imagery in Web applications: Should I use a cached map service or an image service?

If you want to retain the properties of an image (like pixel values, image enhancement, etc.), you need to publish the image as a image service. If it is just for visualization purpose, you might like to go for Map Service.

Caching will improve the rendering for both Map as well as image service. It is advisable to cache, if the map/image service don't change often.

Join the Conversation

Signed in members can post, follow updates, and more. New here? Register a free account.

Quick Links

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.