Recentemente, encontrei um post interessante no blog do KnowWhere <\/A> chamado "Esri isn't evil<\/A>". Fiquei realmente impressionado com a abertura do autor que se autodenomina um defensor do open source. Ele levanta algumas boas questões. O que é open realmente? E uma empresa como a Esri, com software proprietário, pode realmente ser open também?<\/P><\/P>Acho importante ser claro sobre o que open realmente significa. Queremos falar de open source? Estamos falando de open data? Ou talvez open specs? Ou queremos discutir open business models<\/A>? Isso ajuda a evitar confusão durante uma discussão.<\/P><\/P>A Esri mantém um site sobre sua open vision<\/A> que recomendo muito a leitura. Ele explica claramente o entendimento da Esri sobre open e como a empresa apoia as várias categorias. Justo.<\/P><\/P>Mas como você vê o open? Qual é a sua compreensão? E o que isso realmente significa para você afinal? Deixe-nos saber sua opinião!<\/P><\/P>Atenciosamente, Lars<\/P><\/P><\/P><\/BODY><\/HTML>
<\/P>
Acho importante ser claro sobre o que open realmente significa. Queremos falar de open source? Estamos falando de open data? Ou talvez open specs? Ou queremos discutir
A Esri mantém um site sobre sua
Mas como você vê o open? Qual é a sua compreensão? E o que isso realmente significa para você afinal? Deixe-nos saber sua opinião!<\/P>
Atenciosamente, Lars<\/P>
<\/P><\/BODY><\/HTML>
I wrote an article about this a few months ago... "open" means too many things, but I think each one would understand "open" differently based on the context you use to use it.
You can search "open" in a thesaurus, in the wikipedia, or anywhere else and you will find different meanings. The three of us writing here use to work with developers and startups, and if a tech company use the term "open" will understand "open" as "Open source", that's why I use to say.... to avoid misunderstandings we should tray to avoid the sentence: "Esri is Open", because it will likely lead open a discussion with many people.
I really believe in the Esri Open Vision, which doesn't mean (of course) that our business model or core products are open/open source.
Cheers!
BTW: Google is another great example of company promoting and embracing open source but their core products are not open, their business model either, etc <- and I also believe that Google also deserves to call themselves "a company with an open vision", don't you?.
Open source means in my opinion the product’s code is openly readable to anyone. If for example it’s an API, the actual API is readable.
Easy to see why open source is a good. Community collaboration, there’s no hidden agendas and it’s normally free to use. I use many open source tools and products in my everyday life. It’s a community that is, and always will be needed.
That being said. I use many closed source products too. Products that I trust wholeheartedly that they’re done properly and I expect to work.
Open and closed source work well separately and together. Esri has a good mix. An example is the JavaScript API. It’s closed source but there’s plenty of community support available still. Open source projects on GitHub, sample code and Esri genuinely try to help the developer community. It's free(mostly) to develop and try out. When you start to profit, money goes to support the creators. I think that makes sense.
I could write pages about this... But this is an overview of my opinion.
Membros conectados podem postar, seguir atualizações e mais. Novo aqui? Registre uma conta gratuita.
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.