When a Map Package (.mpkx) is opened, it unpacks the data to a folder on the user's profile like C:\Users\username\Documents\ArcGIS\Packages\somepackagename_ea7585. The project can then be saved to a location the user specifies. This is very handy, especially for those that are new to GIS. However, it can lead to unintended data management failure. Lets say the user who packaged the map packaged up an entire agency's imagery and sent it in a 20 GB map package. Then, the receiving user opens it and can't imagine what's taking so long when they try to open it and then their computer starts complaining about low disk space. ArcGIS Pro may even crash and not be able to open. This new user now has a full hard drive and doesn't even know where the files were being created so that they can go delete them. This is an extreme (but very real example). However, even if we aren't opening 20 GB map packages very often, shouldn't the data for our project, live in our project folder? I think it would be great if Map Packages opened very similar to a Template. When you choose to open a .mpkx file, you are prompted to specify where you want the project saved. This allows it to be unpacked to that location so the user knows where the data lives. I'm experienced and know how to discover the location of the data used in a map and move it to a new location. But, this is still extra (unnecessary) work, in my opinion. I love the Map Package concept and useability. I'd just really love it to make more sense from a data management perspective. Thanks!