nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Sta ArcGIS Server Federation toe met ArcGIS Online

PF1

<\/HEAD>

Overweeg alstublieft om ArcGIS for Server federatie toe te staan met ArcGIS Online. We hebben veel on-premise ArcGIS Server implementaties die gebruikmaken van 'token' gebaseerde authenticatie of 'web-tier' (Microsoft Integrated Windows Authentication). Voor publiek gehoste 'beveiligde' inhoud streven we ernaar om over te schakelen naar het gebruik van enterprise logins met SAML om onze bedrijfsidentiteitsopslag te koppelen en Two Factor Authentication (TFA) op te lossen. Momenteel is de enige manier om te integreren met SAML op een ArcGIS Server door deze te federeren met een "Portal for ArcGIS" product (on-premise ArcGIS Online). Hoewel dat technisch haalbaar is, hebben we moeite met het beheren van twee openbare portals: één voor cloud-gehoste inhoud (ArcGIS Online) en één voor on-premise gehoste inhoud (ArcGIS Server). We willen onze on-premise inhoud beschikbaar maken voor onze ArcGIS Online portal (via server federatie) zodat we slechts 1 portal kunnen gebruiken en voldoen aan de vereisten om te integreren met SAML. De gebruikerservaring bij het wisselen tussen portals (vanuit ArcGIS Desktop en Collector for ArcGIS) is niet intuïtief voor eindgebruikers. Dank u!<\/P><\/BODY><\/HTML>

Vind meer berichten getagd met

Status: Openen

Reacties

BillFox

Good idea,

As of now I think you can do a hybrid with a public facing ArcGIS Server in the DMZ.

secure the publishing folder with built-in user name/password
share the secure service of your on premise enterprise geodatabase feature class to AGOL and use option to save user name/password with the service
SAML AGOL to your AD
add AD users to AGOL, groups, etc.
but editor tracking from AGOL will probably post the built-in user instead of the SAML one
on premise portal would post the correct AD user

-Bill

MikeDahm

Are there any updates on this? We have several municipal clients that use ArcGIS Server and ArcGIS Online and saving the credentials to Online makes all edits show as the saved credentials. They are smaller municipalities that rely on us for their GIS needs. Adding Portal to their deployments just isn't feasible right now. Having users login multiple times (once to AGOL and once to the layers) would be a real pain for field crews and less technical personnel. It also becomes a problem with users needing to remember 2 different accounts and passwords. Being able to properly utilize editor tracking from their SQL database and ArcGIS Server through ArcGIS Online would be a huge help.

SzymonPiskula1

What if you registered some of Server services in AGOL storing the credentials? They would then only have to log in to AGOL. Credentials would be stored in the item once registered:

ArcGIS Server web services—ArcGIS Online Help | ArcGIS

MikeDahm

That is the process we currently use but the editor tracking then uses whatever saved credentials for that services for all creation and last edited by. You can't tell who was logged into ArcGIS Online to do the edits. So if you have 5 users that are setup through ArcGIS Online to access a feature layer that has stored credentials all of their edits will show the stored credentials as the editor or creator of features.

Anonymous User

OK silly question here. I'm trying to set up Portal and slowly get in to Pro.

It appears if I enable licenses for Pro for our Portal, that if I for example take my laptop out of the building to another network, it won't work. Now, I could go into the manager and re-license to AGOL. But that's hassle and also some users don't have ability to do that themselves. Is the idea of this thread to allow for one credential, which would work for both simultaneously? That would be good. Until then I think a lot of large entities will hit this roadblock and simply wait on Pro for this to be implemented. This is one of those things where at first I was just hoping I wasn't understanding it right but I think it is designed this way currently. This mirrors the issue of publishing directly to Server from Pro in that it's an important design concept and issue.

Doe mee aan het gesprek

Meld je aan om te posten, content te volgen en meer. Nieuw hier? Registreer gratis.