nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

What are the cons of not federating a server

RenatoSalvaleon

Most of the documentation I see is what federation can do and its pros but what do I miss if I don't federate my server.

Vind meer berichten getagd met

Accepted answers

JayantaPoddar

You could check the comparison among different levels of integration of ArcGIS Server site and Portal for ArcGIS, i.e., No Server Integration/ with Federated Server (No Hosting Server)/ Federated with Hosting Server.

About using your portal with ArcGIS Server—Portal for ArcGIS (10.5.x) | ArcGIS Enterprise

All comments

JayantaPoddar

About using your portal with ArcGIS Server—Portal for ArcGIS (10.5.x) | ArcGIS Enterprise

RenatoSalvaleon

This is the answer I'm looking for. Thanks!

CesarARR

There's no "hosting server" without being federated?

TomMagdaleno2

From what I have experienced, the symbology is not as good. It makes it have the same rules for symbology as AGOL. So if you have a solution that is internal that uses rest services you will be limited on the symbology if you federate.

Doe mee aan het gesprek

Aangemelde leden kunnen berichten plaatsen, updates volgen en meer. Nieuw hier? Registreer een gratis account.

Snelle Links

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.