Hi Stacywood,Will you please describe more about how the projection is wrong? Are the points on the map in a location that you do not expect? If you could provide one sample image (and the city/area where you think it should draw on the map) I would be happy to look into the problem.All the best,Drew -Esri
I think people are also running into the issue of not being able to use the html popup tool in layout view, at least from what I have gathered on a few random forums. It took me awhile to come across a solution for my greyed out tool.
I ran the tool and attached the photos per ESRIS instructions. When I use the HTML tool, the information for the photo appears, but not the image. Also, it will not let me click the "add photos as attachments" box. I tried several times and created new point feature classes, and got the same results.
Hi, we need some more details. What is the path to your output? Is it a file, personal, or sde geodatabase? Or a shapefile?
Some old versions of file geodatabases are not supported, you would first need to upgrade the gdb by opening the geodatabase general properties and clicking the Upgrade button.
You also need at least a Standard ArcGIS for Desktop license, Basic doesn't have geodatabase attachment functionality.
The photos are in a folder. The point file is saved to a file geodatabase, and is updated. I assume I am running a standard license through a group license owned by our company (we have multiple licenses of ArcMap, ArcEditor and ArcInfo) that we share and access through ArcGIS Administrator.
This sounds like a bug. Will you please report it to tech support? Thank you.
Hi Drew,
I am also experiencing the same problem as Daniel above:
"I am encountering the same issue: When I add a photo with an embedded geolocation, the ArcMap 10.1 "Geotagged photos to Points" script does not create a point for the photo. The geoprocessing results window states that the tool has run and a feature class has been created. However, when I click on a row in the attribute table (where the photo name does appear), it zooms to an incorrect region of the world. In addition, no visible point has been created.
I have replicated this problem with several different photographs, which were all processed using a standard graphics program. I thought that perhaps the graphics program had stripped the geolocation from the photo, but looking at the EXIF data, the spatial location is still there."
Is this also a possibly bug?
thank you,
Susan
Aangemelde leden kunnen berichten plaatsen, updates volgen en meer. Nieuw hier? Registreer een gratis account.
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.