nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Hoe ontbrekende gegevens over water te corrigeren

BrianBulla

Zie de afbeelding hieronder. Dit is een vlucht over enkele lagunes die ik maar half heb afgerond, maar het deel dat ik wel heb afgerond kwam niet zo goed uit. Is er een aanbevolen manier om te vliegen wanneer er veel water is? Het lijkt erop dat het de tegels niet aan elkaar kan plakken en daarom ontbreken er gegevens.<\/P>

Moet ik dit misschien vanaf een hogere hoogte doen (ik dacht dat ik al hoog zat)? Of misschien lager?? Minder overlap of meer??<\/P>

Alle hulp wordt gewaardeerd.<\/P>

<\/span><\/P> <\/P> <\/P>

Vind meer berichten getagd met

Accepted answers

Andrew-Bowne

Try flying higher if you can, a little slower, and more overlap. You could also try flying on an overcast day. Reflection off of water can cause the issues you are seeing.

All comments

Andrew-Bowne

Try flying higher if you can, a little slower, and more overlap. You could also try flying on an overcast day. Reflection off of water can cause the issues you are seeing.

BrianBulla

Hi,

Yes, flying higher seems to fix this issue. Thanks!

NicoBonnafoux

@BrianBulla in addition to Andrew's suggestion, give the Reality Engine beta a try, it handles water and reflective surface better, with further improvements coming soon.
In the future, we'll also add the "Water Body Correction Feature" available in the desktop ArcGIS Reality products, which flattens water areas and helps avoid gaps.

BrianBulla

Hi @NicoBonnafoux . I just reprocessed the above using the Reality Engine, but I would say things did not improve.

Is there a particular setting I need to adjust in Site Scan??

NicoBonnafoux

If that's the case, I suspect the issue is with your source images.

Could you share a screenshot with the image locations displayed, and perhaps a few of the images?

Based on your previous note stating that flying higher helped improve the results, I suspect this capture was flown lower and has many images showing only water.

BrianBulla

Hi,

Here are the photos. I still need to go back to this site as I need to finish it completely, fly it higher, and on a cloudy day. These are the lower, sunny day images.

NicoBonnafoux

Flying higher will definitely help here to ensure you don't have images showing only water which leads to a lack of tie points between images.
It also seems your overlap isn't consistent, I suggest making sure you're using a high-end SD card with a fast write speed (U3/V30 class or better).

Doe mee aan het gesprek

Aangemelde leden kunnen berichten plaatsen, updates volgen en meer. Nieuw hier? Registreer een gratis account.

Snelle Links

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.