Bij het bekijken van de nieuwe UNM3.0 en 3.1 assetpakketmodellen lijkt het erop dat sommige van de domeindatasets de domeincode en beschrijvingen verwisseld hebben. Dit veroorzaakt een fout in de demogegevens.
Is dit een fout in het assetpakket?
The domain you pointed out is correct. The domain codes are the diameter in inches. The domain description is the gauge. Why did we do this? So that the diameter can be easily used in calculations without having to perform a domain lookup. For example, a voltage drop uses the resistance of the wire and the diameter of the wire.
Thanks John. I understand this. The issue is the data appears to be migrated incorrectly with the domain codes in the dataset creating errors as the validation is for the domain description. There are other examples such as switch status' have the value 2 presented to the user, causing this to be an error as the domain description being validated is open or closed.
Aangemelde leden kunnen berichten plaatsen, updates volgen en meer. Nieuw hier? Registreer een gratis account.
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.
