About graduated color settings

Question

Regarding editing break values ​​for quantity-driven symbols such as graduated colors or graduated circles.
Has this ever happened to you?

1. The upper bounds were automatically set to "<=2.2,<=12.8,<=17.9,<=25.3,<=39," but I want to set them to "<=10,<=20,<=30,<=40,<=50," so I manually change them from top to bottom.

2. As soon as I change "2.2" to "10" and "12.8" to "20," the symbol is automatically loaded and the order changes to "<=10,<=17.9,<=20..."

3. If I then accidentally change the second-placed "17.9" ​​to "20," one class will be lost. I'll have to change the spacing back to "Manual" and start over.

4. I need to make sure I don't accidentally overwrite "20," but since the color order has also changed, it's hard to intuitively know which upper limit to rewrite.

I need to change the upper limit value many times, and every time I do, I'm plagued by this "automatic order change function."

I've been putting up with this hassle for years, what do you all do?

Is there an easier way? I'd appreciate it if I've overlooked something.

I wish it were like ArcMap, where you click "Apply" after setting everything up and the symbols are updated.

-_- · Answer

Thank you.

I'm dissatisfied with the fact that I have to input numbers slowly.

That's because when I enter a number and press Enter, the focal point moves (to the wrong position) as if to say, "Please enter the next number quickly."

I feel this is a design flaw.

But it seems that not many people feel the same way. Maybe I'm just impatient...

BenMoir · Answer

I have encountered this issue as well, where ArcGIS pro automatically reorders my graduated colours list. My suggestion is go slowly. Use the Method drop down to get a distribution close to the one you want (e.g. defined interval in your case). Then go back to Method and choose manual interval for fine tuning. Fewer things to change.

-_- · Answer

That feature was requested, got a lot of support, and was resolved a few years later.

However, my issue was with editing the upper limit of symbols, not labels, so I don't think what you've suggested applies.
Unless I've missed something.