nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Sub-Frames

AndrewCole

Currently, to have any type of inset, it must be it's own independant data frame.

Instead, how about "sub-frames" where the data is still connected, you are just viewing a different area/extent.

Example: Map of USA, to include Alaska and Hawaii you make seperate data frames with independant symbology, so a change to one symbology requires going in and changing sybology for all 3, or more, data frames.

Instead: Use the "sub-frames" to bring the other two states into view, with connected symbology and lables and only one layer of annotation that goes over top of it all.

タグ付きの投稿をもっと見る

Layout

Already Offered

Status: Already Offered

JurajKrumpolec

AubriOtis

This is how map frames work in ArcGIS Pro. You can have multiple map frames with unique extents pointing to the same map.

会話に参加する

投稿、コンテンツのフォローなどにはサインインしてください。初めてですか？無料で登録しましょう。