nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Waybackの画像とWaybackのメタデータが一致しません。何か説明はありますか？

Hornbydd

私はSouth Georgiaの氷河前線のデータセットを更新するためにWaybackの画像にアクセスしています。ArcProとWaybackの画像は、日付が分かっている場合に限り、便利なデータセットとしてデジタイズに利用できます。<\/P>

したがって、同じリリースの画像に対応するWaybackのメタデータにもアクセスしています。<\/P>

実際には、見ている画像の一部は数年前のものであり、World Imageryがまだ新しい画像に更新されていないことは理解しており、それは理にかなっていて許容範囲だと思います。<\/P>

しかし、未来の日付を報告している場合は非常に疑わしく感じます！それは私が実際に見ているものへの信頼を損ないます。Esri Imageryチームの誰か、この現象について説明してもらえますか？<\/P>

私は2019年（r00）をオンにし、その対応する2019_r00のメタデータも使用しています。歴史的な氷河前線データセットには2003年の端が選択されています。2003年のデータはLandsat 7を使って取得されました。2003年の端は2019年のWayback画像と非常によく一致しています。<\/P>

ここで私の小さな頭脳は、2019年のWorld Imageryは更新されておらず、したがって2003年の画像を表示していると考えています。それは論理的に筋が通っていますが、右側のポップアップを見るとメタデータが2024年の画像を報告しており、5年先のfuture<\/EM>になっていますか？<\/P><\/span><\/P> <\/P>

タグ付きの投稿をもっと見る

Imagery

Accepted answers

JeffreySwain

Hi Duncan,

For that tile layer, if you are searching for the collection date of that imagery, then you can trust that the 2019 tile layer contains imagery from 2019 and so on for each of the tile layers. However, if you are researching on the acquisition date for a particular dataset within that dataset, other than the listed year in the set you will not find it with those fields. If you want specific dates, I would consider the Living Atlas Sentinel 2a Level 2 or Landsat imagery layers for specific dates.

Both have 'Acquisition date' fields that you can trust.

All comments

JonM32

@DuncanHornby

Hi Duncan - you may have some better luck sorting out the metadata by referring to the app below. I used it lately to figure out when and why the imagery in my area changed. The metadata seemed to be up to date. It looks like you may be using the same thing in Pro already though.

Wayback App - https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback

Hornbydd

Hi Jon,

Thanks for the pointer to the website, I explored this and the info box that pops up provides even less detail than the metadata layer when loaded in ArcPro. So it does not resolve my query. Useful website for quickly checking imagery.

Duncan

JonM32

No problem. Out of curiosity, what rest service are you accessing the wayback imagery and metadata from in Pro?

Hornbydd

For the metadata the url was - https://metadata.maptiles.arcgis.com/arcgis/services

For the imagery the url was - https://wayback.maptiles.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World_Imagery/MapServer

StephanieDockstader

Hi Duncan, Thanks for your question. I have sent this to our product eningeering team to review. I will post thier response here once I get some additional details.

Thanks,

--Stephanie

JeffreySwain

Hey Duncan,

I went in and was looking into your issue and there are a few things to discuss. So first since you are using the World Imagery layer you need to understand that while it shows imagery it is a tile layer.

So what you are reviewing is the metadata of the tiles, not the source imagery. So when a tile layer is created, 'tiles' based on the source imagery are created. So the metadata you are looking at refers to the creation of the tiles rather than the source imagery. That metadata is updated each time the tiles for that tile layer are updated which happens periodically.

If you are interested in pixel values and the source imagery, then be sure to select an Imagery layer like this one - US NAIP Imagery layer.

Once an imagery layer like that is added to ArcGIS Pro, you can use the Raster Item Explorer.

Hope this helps.

Jeff

Hornbydd

Hi Jeff,

Thanks for finding time to help me understand the data.

So using my example in the original question, am I correct in saying that the way back images were archived in 2019 and that knowing from the glacier dataset I have it was showing a 2003 image when it was archived. But since then the tile layer has been rebuilt and has overwritten (?) the original source image date with 2024 date? Would that mean as a user I can never truly know what the source image date is as the metadata is reporting the built date of the tile layer?

Or have I got the wrong end of the stick?

JeffreySwain

Hi Duncan,

Hornbydd

Hi Jeff,

Thanks for pointing me to the sentinel 2 imagery layer. This is indeed giving me that much needed acquisition date. It's a shame that the wayback data does not seem to keep that, as the quality of those images are very good. May be moving forward, future versions of the wayback metadata could provide such information? I can only but hope!

Duncan

JeffreySwain

Hi Duncan,

All of the layers in ArcGIS Online have upsides and downsides and can be used for very different purposes. For the Wayback imagery, the tile layers perform exceptionally well and look amazing. For the purposes of the Wayback machine, they perform amazingly. The app visualizes what once was so tile layers work exceptionally. For more analytical purposes, imagery layers provide pixel values and source metadata. So the wayback machine has performed its purpose as the start of your analysis and led you to other research options.

I hope your research works out and if you have any other questions feel free to message me on the Esri Community app.

会話に参加する

サインインしたメンバーは投稿、更新のフォローなどができます。初めてですか？無料アカウントを登録してください。

クイックリンク

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.