nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

ArcGIS Pro: 2.4.2: In general, ArcPro has less performance than ArcMap,

JamalNUMAN

I observed that the ArcPro has less performance than ArcMap. This observation is related to all tools and behaviors

Trouver plus de publications taguées avec

Accepted answers

All comments

MPC_KineticGIS_Department

I have noticed significant delays in general navigation through the application. Which gets especially bad if you are faster than the application itself.

Examples:

Select features, and make a selection from the selected features, clear the selected features, if you are too fast doing this the application can hang for a few minutes while it catches up. (local data on a new very high end machine)
adding layers to geoprocessing tools by dragging and droping, I find it can take upto a minute just to add a layer from the map to the append tool
Manage Tile Cache Tooloverall performance, useability, and interaction with this particular tool is just Bad on every level, ArcMap is probably about 800% faster.

DCL_true_square_avatar.png

DavidWheelock2

Here's another important feature missing from ArcGIS Pro that's in ArcMap. Please give it an up-vote.

ArcGIS Pro: Enable "Add all values" to use format settings from "All Other Values"

JohannaKraus2

Also missing in Pro is the home and default gdb options on the export window (for both data and pdfs):

JamalNUMAN

How about your experience in 2.7.2?

Rejoindre la conversation

Les membres connectés peuvent publier, suivre les mises à jour, et plus encore. Nouveau ici ? Inscrivez-vous gratuitement.

Liens rapides

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.