How common is it to use ‘regular’ Toolbox tools in ArcGIS Pro 2.1.1 along with GeoAnalytics Tools (GeoAnalytics Server 10.6) within the same workflow?
I have seen the combining of GeoAnalytics tools and ‘other’ tools within a workflow in an Esri demonstration online, but I am still wondering about the effectiveness of using the GeoAnalytics Server (along with ArcGIS Pro) with a workflow that contains several geoprocessing steps, only one or two of which can be accomplished using a tool in the GeoAnalytics Toolbox. I would think that the advantage of the faster processing afforded by the GeoAnalytics Server could be outweighed by the time it takes to move data up to the appropriate Data Store and then back down to continue to be processed with the ‘regular’ tools in ArcGIS Pro. Has anyone faced a workflow situation like this, or have some input on the "worth it" factor of such a workflow set-up?