One of the stated requirements for the district heating and cooling data model is to support simple asset management. This sounds great, but I think everyone has a slightly different opinion on what this means. So, if you were to make a top ten list of what it means to perform simple asset management of a DHC in a GIS what would that list be. Here are my thoughts to get the discussion started:
Tom's Top Ten List of Simple Asset Management
1. Ability to create and maintain a digital representation of the physical pipe system.
2. Spatial representation and accurate location of the pipes, devices, fittings and supporting structures of a DHC.
3. Each asset has enough physical description (material, diameter,etc) to support analytical needs of hydraulic analysis, risk analysis, and operational management.
4. Each asset knows its manufacturer and manufacturer lot number to support factory recall identification.
5. Pipe system digital representation is of enough detail to support hydraulic analysis.
6. Pipe system digital representation is of enough detail to support emergency management/leak response tasks.
7. Pipe system digital representation is of enough detail to support risk analysis.
8. Pipe system digital representation is of enough detail to support system growth planning.
9. Each asset has a unique assetID.
10. Each asset knows the Project Number and Work Order ID under which it was installed.
That's my top ten list. What is yours?
Tom DeWitte
Esri, Inc