Symbologie ArcGIS Online / Portal avec Arcade

Question

Bonjour,

J’ai trouvé impressionnante l’utilisation du nouveau langage Arcade pour la symbologie ou l’étiquetage dans ArcGIS Online / Portal.

Nous rencontrons actuellement le problème suivant :

Si je crée une symbologie basée sur 2 champs et que je les concatène pour obtenir une seule valeur de symbologie avec Arcade, la symbologie disparaît de la carte et du modèle d’entité, et seul un point noir s’affiche !

Notre service d’entités possède son propre modèle d’entité créé à partir des champs concaténés, mais lorsque je modifie les entités, les symboles (marqueurs) ne s’affichent pas.

Quelqu’un aurait-il une idée de la raison pour laquelle cela se produit ?

Cordialement,

Karsten

XanderBakker · Answer

Hi Karsten Rank ,

Not sure if I understand your question correctly, but if you want to publish a layer that has a dynamic calculation inside of it, you might want to look at attribute rules. With calculation attribute rules you can have a trigger that the creation of a new feature starts the calculation of a field based on other fields automatically.

More info here:

* https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/geodatabases/overview/an-overview-of-attribute-rules.htm
* https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-pro/data-management/attribute-rules-whats-new-in-arcgis-pro-2-3-and-arcgis-enterprise-10-7/

KarstenRank · Answer

I want to create a symbology depending on two field on the flow.. E.g. if you have five different layers with 20 different symbols, the editor widget is overloaded with 100 symbols.

So my idea was to show only a standard symbol and by changing the attributes, the symbol should change.

Is it possible to publish a field calculation with ArcGIS Pro to a Portal feature service?

XanderBakker · Answer

Hi Karsten Rank ,

What I think is happening is that there is no support for the edit templates to be based on a "virtual field" created with an Arcade expression. I can imagine that you would like to select a concatenated value and that this would fill the two fields it is based. Is that what you want to achieve?

You can use the field calculation and create a actual field for the concatenated values (for which you could define a domain with the accepted values) and create two expressions to extract both parts from this field. That would work.