Oh okay! I figured that might be it since that's all that was left as an uncommon factor!So does that mean that the AREAis not that of the zone? and rather, is that of the cumulative pixel area?
It should be "NoData" cell issue. Your different GRID dataset have different "NoData" cell coverage, so the raster area with one statistic value should be different from another.
Yes, yes, and yes!I run the model two separate times with the different GRID files, with the same cell size, and coordinate system and the AREA values are still different.Any other ideas?
Hi folks,The issue is that each time I run the model with the different raster (.tif) images, the AREA for the same UNIQ_FIDs is different.From what I understand about this tool, is that it performs the statistic specified (in this case = MEAN) of all the raster pixels that it counts within that zone. So I can understand why the COUNT would be different but I don't know why the AREA would change from dbf to dbf?!! Isn't the zone (in this case= polygon referenced by UNIQ_FID) remaining the same? Maybe I have the whole Zonal Analysis idea wrong in my mind. Could anyone help me make sense of why the area would be changing.
Les membres connectés peuvent publier, suivre les mises à jour, et plus encore. Nouveau ici ? Inscrivez-vous gratuitement.
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.