nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Why did Esri choose to create zLas, a proprietary format, rather than collaborating with or building on existing open standards like LASzip?

TomMacWright1

For background, see Paul Ramsey's article: Format Wars Episode V: LIDAR - Boundless‌

And James Fee: LAS, LAZ, LasZip, zLAS and You‌

How does this decision square with Esri's "Open" initiative?

Trouver plus de publications taguées avec

Standards & Specifications

Accepted answers

All comments

There are no accepted answers yet

Rejoindre la conversation

Les membres connectés peuvent publier, suivre les mises à jour, et plus encore. Nouveau ici ? Inscrivez-vous gratuitement.

Se connecter
S'inscrire

Liens rapides

Toutes les communautés
Publications récentes
Contenu suivi
Aide communautaire

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.