nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

ArcSDE Install 2

TedCronin

The list is growing, when will there be a PG 64 bit?

Trouver plus de publications taguées avec

Accepted answers

All comments

RobertWest

Pre-release should be available for download "almost any day" now. We are trying to get all of pre-release up on the resource center for download this week. All beta sites should receive an email when it's available.

Robert

PerNiska

In January, we started building a version of ArcSDE 10 for PostgreSQL on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 update 4. This is a 64 bit implementation. Our goal is to fully test and certify this as ready to ship with pre-release in March.

This is not available in 9.4 Beta2? We have installed RHEL5 (64 bit) on AMD x86/x64, PostGreSQL 8.4 (64 bit) and ArcSDE 9.4 Beta2. When running sdesetup we get the following error:

Connection to database 'xyz' failed
Error creating ArcSDE direct connection (-9).

When will the Pre-release be available?

Per Niska
Dynalab

TedCronin

Sorry, no, that was not the intent at all. I just meant to let you know that there was no 64 bit version of PostgreSQL on Windows that we could use, thus we could not build a 64 bit Windows version of ArcSDE for PostgreSQL, that's all. The other technical details provided in that thread may be interesting, but are really just extra info you probably didn't need.

Robert

I know that was not your intent. You are a nice person. I am stating a fact, that yes, I am a little ignorant, for some things, and in this case, I never realized there was no 64 bit version. I added the quote to say to myself that right there they state there is no win 64 version, thats all.

RobertWest

Sorry, no, that was not the intent at all. I just meant to let you know that there was no 64 bit version of PostgreSQL on Windows that we could use, thus we could not build a 64 bit Windows version of ArcSDE for PostgreSQL, that's all. The other technical details provided in that thread may be interesting, but are really just extra info you probably didn't need.

Robert

TedCronin

PostgreSQL uses a multi-process architecture, not multi-threaded. In a multi-threaded database server, all client connections share the memory space, and are again limited by the total addressable memory region. With PostgreSQL, you could easily have more than 1Gb per backend (if necessary) without running out of memory, which significantly pushes away the point when you need to go to 64-bit.
Robert

Thanks Robert, I am a bit ignorant

RobertWest

We have no plans to build a native 64 bit implementation of ArcSDE for PosgreSQL on Windows. Here's a link explaining why.

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Running_&_Installing_PostgreSQL_On_Native_Windows#Is_there_a_64-bit_build_of_PostgreSQL_for_Windows.3F

If this situation changes, we'll adapt as quickly as we can.

Robert

TedCronin

In January, we started building a version of ArcSDE 10 for PostgreSQL on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 update 4. This is a 64 bit implementation. Our goal is to fully test and certify this as ready to ship with pre-release in March.

Robert

Very aggressive scheduling, Robert. Good to know. Thanks for the prompt response. PG on Linux 64, what about on windows 64?

TedCronin

Can you provide some more information about exactly what you are seeing?

These are just the default values that are inserted in the data files, and log files entry for installing. 100 MB actually makes a bit more sense, I am just noting that there is a change.

RobertWest

In January, we started building a version of ArcSDE 10 for PostgreSQL on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 update 4. This is a 64 bit implementation. Our goal is to fully test and certify this as ready to ship with pre-release in March.

Robert

RussellBrennan

The Initial Data File Size used to be 40 MB, and now it is showing 100 MB, is this the expected behavior?

Can you provide some more information about exactly what you are seeing?

TedCronin

Installs on top of the Nov CTP for SQL 08 R2.

TedCronin

The Initial Data File Size used to be 40 MB, and now it is showing 100 MB, is this the expected behavior?

Rejoindre la conversation

Les membres connectés peuvent publier, suivre les mises à jour, et plus encore. Nouveau ici ? Inscrivez-vous gratuitement.

Liens rapides

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.