nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Les lignes du sous-réseau CP excluent les services et le fil CP

EdwardBlair

Je construis des sous-réseaux CP et j'ai remarqué que les lignes de service (et les fils CP) ont un nom de cpsubnetwork attribué, mais ne sont pas inclus dans la géométrie de la ligne du sous-réseau. Est-ce intentionnel ? Y a-t-il une configuration dans l'outil GP "Update Subnetwork" qui contrôle cela ?

Je ne dis pas que c'est nécessairement une mauvaise chose. Je voudrais juste le comprendre.<\/P>

Merci,

Ed<\/P>

<\/span><\/P> <\/P>

Trouver plus de publications taguées avec

Gas

Accepted answers

RobertKrisher

@EdwardBlair Keep scrolling through the valid features and objects group. This is configurable by using the Aggregated Lines For SubnetLine Feature Class parameter of the Set Subnetwork Definition tool.

All comments

MikeMillerGIS

Aggregating service lines is a bad idea. It creates a very vertex dense subnetline.

RobertKrisher

The asset types used to generate the subnetwork line are specified in the subnetwork definition for the tier. We typically recommend that the aggregated subnetwork line only include the most significant features in the network (high/medium voltage/pressure) because including all the lines creates very dense subnetwork lines that can take up a lot of storage and cause performance issues over time.

Consider that you're creating a full copy of all your line geometries every time you update that subnetwork. It can cascade when considering hierarchical networks that do this for multiple tiers (isolation, pressure, dma, system).

EdwardBlair

I can see that. Is this controllable in any way, or is that just the way it works?

EdwardBlair

I understand the downside of include *many* lines in an aggregated subnetwork line.

But, and sorry to be thick here, I just don't see how the asset groups/asset types that *are* included in the aggregated subnetwork line are defined. I *do* see in the subnetwork tier definition the devices to be included, but not the lines to be aggregated.

RobertKrisher

EdwardBlair

Perfect! Thank you. Just what I was looking for.

Rejoindre la conversation

Les membres connectés peuvent publier, suivre les mises à jour, et plus encore. Nouveau ici ? Inscrivez-vous gratuitement.

Liens rapides

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.