nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Spatial Definition Query - Spatial operations other than intersect

Bud

It looks like the only spatial operation available for spatial definition queries is intersect. I'm wondering if other spatial operations would be beneficial, such as the equivalent of what's available in Select By Location.

Select By Location - Relationship pick list:

Trouver plus de publications taguées avec

Map Authoring

Status: Ouvrir

Réponses

MikeVolz

Bud:

Have you tried to integrate the Spatial Definition Query into a GIS service? I'm curious if services support this functionality at initial release.

Bud

@MichaelVolz GIS services aren't something I work with much; I'm more of a Pro user.

But I did notice this:

Spatial definition query
by TanuHoque

To answer you question, unfortunately we won't be able to support publishing a layer with spatial clause in its active definition query in the first release. We will continue working on it and hope to support sharing in a future release.

Sharing layers with definition queries

When a layer is shared as a feature layer or within a map image layer, only the active definition query is retained and honored. All other inactive definition queries are dropped.
If the query contains a spatial clause, an error is returned. See 00428: The definition query spatial clause is not supported by the server for more information.

AlfredBaldenweck

I would love, among other things, a "Within Distance" option.

Bud

An "Intersect Multiple" operation would be handy too.

Select By Location — Intersect Multiple

Rejoindre la conversation

Connectez-vous pour publier, suivre du contenu, et plus encore. Nouveau ici ? Inscrivez-vous gratuitement.