Hi everyone,
I have done a Kernel density analysis but the results are somewhat confusing. Are these reasonable or am I missing something?
Any assistance or advice is appreciated. See attached for further information.
Is there a guide for how to identify an appropriate output cell size? When doing the optimised hot spot analysis I used a distance band of 70333,51m as one of the parameters. For Raster analysis environments I also notice it does not make any significant difference to the figures.
So your output cell size is 1490 sq km? (see your first post)
I would check the inputs and the raster properties. also 10^6 m^2 per km^2
The area is in square kms.
The tools are the same/similar in their operation between arcmap and Pro.
Zoom into one of your red areas and see how many points fall within a raster cell... probably not many, hence the low density (area is in meters squared I presume)
At the chance of sounding ignorant I have no idea for sure. I have 249 incidents in a road network. Here is the map. Also would these challenges be resolvable in ArcPro Gis documentation given that I am using ArcMap?
Kernel Density (Spatial Analyst)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
magnitude per unit area.
Your area is quite large (aka the denomitor in the division)
are the roadkills quite small per unit area?
Les membres connectés peuvent publier, suivre les mises à jour, et plus encore. Nouveau ici ? Inscrivez-vous gratuitement.
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.
