nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Requesting a Sub-Subtype Option

KenBeville

Controlling data can be challenging. As an electric utility I have alot of requirements on data. An example would be street lights. I have 100+ options for lights and about 10 fields that need controlling, however, I have no desire to create 100+ subtypes since this would be tough to manage. Current we have only two subtypes in order to symbolize upon. As a way of controlling the large amount of optional data we propose a 'sub-subtype' or 'classifcation' (a second tier of data control). This way I can establish a series of classifications that control fields for each subtype without overwhelming the display and query functions that could occur with having too many subytpes.

Encuentra más publicaciones etiquetadas con

Status: Abrir

Comentarios

RadekFujak

Topology can use subtypes. If one feature class had multiple subtypes, I could define topology rules much, much more conveniently.

I vote for this feature thousand times 🙂

RobertBorchert

You should be able to do that with Domains. You can create your base subtype and then for a particular attribute you can assign a domain to only one or more attributes in different subtypes.

I think sub subtypes would get in the way of templates. And if you added a new domained attribute to your feature you would have to visit ever single iteration possible and manually set the domian for each subtype.

Perhaps you could share you 100+ options and someone may be able to suggest a better way to do it.

Únete a la Conversación

Inicia sesión para publicar, seguir contenido y más. ¿Nuevo aquí? Regístrate gratis.