¿Qué significa realmente "open" para ti?

Question

<\/HEAD>Recientemente, encontré una publicación interesante en el blog de KnowWhere <\/A> titulada "Esri isn't evil<\/A>". Me impresionó mucho la apertura del autor que se llama a sí mismo un defensor del open source. Plantea algunas buenas preguntas. ¿Qué es realmente open? ¿Y puede una empresa como Esri con software propietario ser también open?<\/P><\/P> Creo que es bueno ser claro sobre lo que realmente significa open. ¿Queremos hablar de open source? ¿Nos referimos a open data? ¿O más bien a open specs? ¿O queremos discutir los modelos de negocio open<\/A>? Esto ayuda a evitar confusiones durante una discusión.<\/P><\/P> Esri mantiene un sitio web sobre su open vision<\/A> que recomiendo mucho leer. Explica claramente la comprensión de Esri sobre open y cómo la empresa apoya las diversas categorías. Justo.<\/P><\/P> Pero, ¿cómo ves tú el concepto de open? ¿Cuál es tu entendimiento? Y, después de todo, ¿qué significa realmente para ti? ¡Déjanos saber tu opinión!<\/P> <\/P> Saludos, Lars<\/P> <\/P> <\/P><\/BODY><\/HTML>

Raul_Jimenez · Answer

I wrote an article about this a few months ago... "open" means too many things, but I think each one would understand "open" differently based on the context you use to use it.

You can search "open" in a thesaurus, in the wikipedia, or anywhere else and you will find different meanings. The three of us writing here use to work with developers and startups, and if a tech company use the term "open" will understand "open" as "Open source", that's why I use to say.... to avoid misunderstandings we should tray to avoid the sentence: "Esri is Open", because it will likely lead open a discussion with many people.

I really believe in the Esri Open Vision, which doesn't mean (of course) that our business model or core products are open/open source.

Cheers!

BTW: Google is another great example of company promoting and embracing open source but their core products are not open, their business model either, etc <- and I also believe that Google also deserves to call themselves "a company with an open vision", don't you?.

smcgee2 · Answer

Open source means in my opinion the product’s code is openly readable to anyone. If for example it’s an API, the actual API is readable.

Easy to see why open source is a good. Community collaboration, there’s no hidden agendas and it’s normally free to use. I use many open source tools and products in my everyday life. It’s a community that is, and always will be needed.

That being said. I use many closed source products too. Products that I trust wholeheartedly that they’re done properly and I expect to work.

Open and closed source work well separately and together. Esri has a good mix. An example is the JavaScript API. It’s closed source but there’s plenty of community support available still. Open source projects on GitHub, sample code and Esri genuinely try to help the developer community. It's free(mostly) to develop and try out. When you start to profit, money goes to support the creators. I think that makes sense.

I could write pages about this... But this is an overview of my opinion.