Manejo de Datos de Registro con Grandes Distancias de Desajuste

Question

<\/HEAD>En un esfuerzo por convertir algunos de nuestros mapas antiguos al parcel fabric, me he encontrado con varios mapas donde los lotes que tienen una dirección y distancia registradas, no cierran dentro de la tolerancia especificada (0.3281), y además no proporcionan un área declarada debido a este gran desajuste una vez trazados.<\/P> <\/P> En el ejemplo adjunto a continuación, en los tax parcels, verá el nombre del parcel, el área declarada y la distancia de desajuste. Como puede ver, hay varios tax parcels que no tienen un área declarada, y también tienen una gran distancia de desajuste. (También adjunté el mapa de 1922 como referencia).<\/P> <\/P> Mi pregunta es, ¿es apropiado mantener estos parcels dentro del fabric sabiendo que no cierran? ¿Cómo se maneja este tipo de datos? Cualquier información en situaciones como estas es muy apreciada.<\/P> <\/P> <\/P> <\/P> <\/P> <\/P> Walid<\/P><\/BODY><\/HTML>

LarryGaudieri1 · Answer

And keep in mind that the data model for the parcel fabric allows for record bearings and distances (and misclosure residuals) to stay with the parcel even after it has been joined to the adjacent parcels. As long as you are sure that your basis of bearings, point of commencement, and point of beginning are correct and the adjacent parcels are fitted to the rest of your fabric, those errors will still be part of the parcel's metadata.

LarryGaudieri1 · Answer

I'm not a surveyor but having worked with / for them for over 20 years there are a couple approaches you could take. According to Wattles ("Writing Legal Descriptions", 1979), monuments cited or existing physically hold over everything. So, if the record data had "calls" to a right-of-way or any other cited / recorded land corner or line will hold over distance and direction.

Next is distance. Distance is weighted over bearings particularly because of objectivity in portions of the basis-of-bearing or because of contrasting adjoining descriptions disagree. So, if any of your adjoining parcels are cited within one of the non-closing others, and one of them is closing within a reasonable error, then hold that parcel as described to test better alignment or fit.

This is one of the primary elements associated with raw record data requiring cogo to prepare parcel fabric data. It won't always be correct. In your traverse editor there are options to adjust a polygon and the results can be evaluated to see if they'll still agree with the rest of your fabric. In reality, the parcel is closed by 4 bounding monuments of some type. The misclosure is due to insufficient calculations or a scrivener's error