Cuando comparo esquemas de datos de muestra de Utility Network en ArcGIS Pro, noté que la versión 3.2 incluye algunas tablas adicionales de soporte como D_rename, mientras que este tipo de tablas faltan en el modelo 3.3. ¿Causará algún problema si uso estas tablas antiguas, como D_rename de la versión 3.2, con el modelo de datos 3.3? Además, ¿estas versiones de Utility Network están vinculadas a versiones específicas de ArcGIS Pro o ArcGIS Enterprise? Si actualizo mi versión de Enterprise más adelante, ¿podría potencialmente romper o causar problemas con una Utility Network que fue creada usando una versión anterior?

Regarding the D_ tables, yes, it is possible to use older D_ tables with a newer schema. A word of caution though. The newer schema is likely different from the older schema, and the configuration and rename may not give you the results you are expecting because of this difference. You can and should do an update of these tables and review them for changes in the schema. The suggested workflow would be as follows: * Add the older D_ tables to the newer asset package * Run the Create Rename Table tool in the Utility Network Package Tools toolbox.* Specify only the asset package parameter. Do not enter anything in the rename fields. This will update the rename table against the new schema while retaining any previously set values. * Run the Create Configurations Table tool in the Utility Network Package Tools toolbox.* Specify only the asset package parameter. Do not enter anything in the configurations fields. This will update the configuration table against the new schema while retaining any previously set values. * Review the updated D_ tables and make changes as you see fit. * Use the Config and/or Rename tables when applying the asset package.

nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Versión del Esquema de Datos de Utility Network

EsraCındır

Cuando comparo esquemas de datos de muestra de Utility Network en ArcGIS Pro, noté que la versión 3.2 incluye algunas tablas adicionales de soporte como D_rename, mientras que este tipo de tablas faltan en el modelo 3.3.<\/P>

¿Causará algún problema si uso estas tablas antiguas, como D_rename de la versión 3.2, con el modelo de datos 3.3?<\/P>

Además, ¿estas versiones de Utility Network están vinculadas a versiones específicas de ArcGIS Pro o ArcGIS Enterprise? Si actualizo mi versión de Enterprise más adelante, ¿podría potencialmente romper o causar problemas con una Utility Network que fue creada usando una versión anterior?<\/P>

Encuentra más publicaciones etiquetadas con

Wastewater

Water Distribution

Network Management

Accepted answers

PatrickGCowan

Regarding the D_ tables, yes, it is possible to use older D_ tables with a newer schema. A word of caution though. The newer schema is likely different from the older schema, and the configuration and rename may not give you the results you are expecting because of this difference. You can and should do an update of these tables and review them for changes in the schema.

The suggested workflow would be as follows:

Add the older D_ tables to the newer asset package
Run the Create Rename Table tool in the Utility Network Package Tools toolbox.
- Specify only the asset package parameter. Do not enter anything in the rename fields. This will update the rename table against the new schema while retaining any previously set values.
Run the Create Configurations Table tool in the Utility Network Package Tools toolbox.
- Specify only the asset package parameter. Do not enter anything in the configurations fields. This will update the configuration table against the new schema while retaining any previously set values.
Review the updated D_ tables and make changes as you see fit.
Use the Config and/or Rename tables when applying the asset package.

All comments

EsraCındır

Thanks @PatrickGCowan, i will try your workflow suggestion.

PatrickGCowan

The suggested workflow would be as follows:

Add the older D_ tables to the newer asset package
Run the Create Rename Table tool in the Utility Network Package Tools toolbox.
- Specify only the asset package parameter. Do not enter anything in the rename fields. This will update the rename table against the new schema while retaining any previously set values.
Run the Create Configurations Table tool in the Utility Network Package Tools toolbox.
- Specify only the asset package parameter. Do not enter anything in the configurations fields. This will update the configuration table against the new schema while retaining any previously set values.
Review the updated D_ tables and make changes as you see fit.
Use the Config and/or Rename tables when applying the asset package.

Ayan Palit

@EsraCındır There is definite Utility network compatibility to ArcGIS Pro and ArcGIS Enterprise.

As a general rule for working with mixed releases and the utility network, ArcGIS client applications (such as ArcGIS Pro and ArcGIS Enterprise) are backward compatible. However, best practice is to align with the Network Management Release Plan

The Utility Network schema changes are tied to functionality and documented at the Utility Network Foundation solution release notes. You can review Water Utility Network Foundation Release notes

Únete a la Conversación

Los miembros registrados pueden publicar, seguir actualizaciones y más. ¿Nuevo aquí? Regístrate gratis.

Enlaces Rápidos

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.