Using ArcGIS Pro 3.2.0 and ArcGIS Pro 3.1.4
I hope the following is understandable. I’ve been working with ArcPy and am encountering a potential issue with importing custom toolboxes using the ImportToolbox function, specifically with .tbx and .atbx files. The problem does not occur with .pyt files.
According to the documentation, the recommended usage of ImportToolbox is as follows:
ImportToolbox(input_file, {module_name})
def ImportToolbox(input_file, module_name=None😞
"ImportToolbox(input_file, {module_name})
Imports the specified toolbox into ArcPy, allowing for access to the
toolbox's associated tools.
input_file(String):
The geoprocessing toolbox added to the ArcPy site package.
module_name{String}:
If the toolbox does not have an alias, the module_name is required.
When a tool is accessed through the ArcPy site package, the toolbox alias
where the tool is contained is a required suffix (
arcpy.<toolname>_<alias> ). Since ArcPy depends on toolbox aliases to
access and execute the correct tool, aliases are extremely important when
importing custom toolboxes. A good practice is to always define a custom
toolbox's alias; however, if the toolbox alias is not defined, a
temporary alias can be set as the second parameter."
The toolbox alias is crucial for accessing tools, and if not defined, a temporary alias can be set with the second parameter (module_name). However, in our tests, we’ve observed that setting the module_name parameter can overwrite the predefined alias in .tbx and .atbx files, leading to execution failures for certain tools.
Test Results:
.tbx:
ImportToolbox(tbx_path)
arcpy.<alias>.<toolname> → Success
ImportToolbox(tbx_path, module_name)
arcpy.<module_name>.<toolname> → Success
ImportToolbox(tbx_path)
arcpy.<alias>.<toolname> → fail:
- without module_name, but referencing tools using the predefined alias, worked fine.
- The issue arises when the module_name is introduced, which overwrites the alias. It is this alias overwrite that leads to process failures, not the predefined alias in ArcGIS Pro itself.
.pyt: No issues at all. The alias can be redefined without the problems observed with .tbx and .atbx files.
We’re trying to determine if this is a bug or expected behavior. The .pyt files work as expected, but .tbx and .atbx exhibit problematic behavior when the module_name parameter is used, likely due to the alias being overwritten.
Has anyone else encountered this? Any advice or insights would be appreciated! If this is indeed a bug, we’d like to report it.
Thank you