I've been tasked with looking into approaches to doing an ArcGIS Enterprise Health Check.
My literature review so far suggests that organisations often engage external consultants to review their ArcGIS Enterprise using three steps:
- Consultants spend 2-3 days onsite to learn about the current implementation and any concerns with it;
- Consultants install monitoring software to obtain baseline information about how the current implementation is performing; and
- Consultants provide a written report to summarize the results of the meetings and monitoring, and to make recommendations for improvements
If you have been involved in an ArcGIS Enterprise Health Check, is the approach above what you would recommend, or do you have other advice to offer?
