nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Cambio/error no solicitado en la simbología de los servicios de entidades en el mapa web y la aplicación

HCCGISICT_

Hola:

Nuestra organización tiene varios mapas web que sirven de base para aplicaciones incluidas en nuestra galería pública de mapas.

Hace poco, en este mapa en particular:

https://hobartcc.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f32a803c066a457aaafa73c6003be761

Dos servicios de entidades han sufrido fallos en la simbología sin que hayamos intervenido. El contenido de las clases de entidad no se ha modificado desde su publicación inicial a principios de noviembre de 2015.

Inundación por peligros costeros
Franjas de peligro de erosión costera

He intentado quitar los servicios del mapa, guardar el mapa, eliminar los servicios de entidades y las definiciones de entidades, volver a publicarlos y agregar los nuevos servicios al mapa, pero no ha cambiado nada. Al intentar agregar los servicios de entidades republicados a una nueva ventana de mapa, se obtiene un resultado similar. También he intentado ejecutar una comprobación de topología para detectar errores, pero no se aprecia ningún problema.

Puedo exportar los servicios de entidades a un shapefile en ArcGIS Online, descargarlo y abrirlo en ArcGIS Desktop sin que haya errores de simbología.

Agradecería mucho cualquier consejo.

Saludos,

Roy Langman

Ciudad de Hobart

Tasmania, Australia.

Encuentra más publicaciones etiquetadas con

Accepted answers

All comments

pt_instructor

Roy, your question caught my interest and so I took a closer look at your data. I noticed that some Coastal Hazard Inundation polygons are extremely small. For example, OBJECTID=115 is just a few square centimeters. Even though these sliver polygons are, presumably, unintended, they shouldn't normally be a big problem. However, I suspect that the projection from 28355 to Web Mercator (102100) at this scale is somehow screwing things up.

To quickly test this notion, I think I would make copies of the two suspect data sets and simply delete all polygons that are less than, say, 1 square meter. Point the layers to these edited copies and republish the services. Test the web map and if it solves the problem, you could then look at more sophisticated editing techniques to preserve the areas from the slivers in your original data.

HCCGISICT_

Hey Paul,

Your fast response and advice is fantastic! I was really scratching my head as to what may be causing the issue.

I will try your suggestion ASAP.

These suggestions are helpful and will hopefully correct the current issue.

Has there been a change to the projection system used in arcgisonline which may have caused the data to do this?

Kind Regards,

Roy Langman

GIS Development | ICT services

50 Macquarie Street, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 7000 | hobartcity.com.au<http://www.hobartcity.com.au/>

Telephone (03) 6238 2452

image001.png

image002.jpg

HCCGISICT_

Hello Paul,

Copied the feature classes, deleted all polygons which were smaller than one square metre, republished then added the new feature services back to my original map. The problem appears to have resolved.

I now need to deal with and issue surrounding the authors of the data set, I don't have permission to make theapparent changes I need in order to support an AGOL map service.

Did you have any luck with the question relating to why this error has occurred given we had not changed the underlying feature service?

Once again, thank you for the response.

Roy.

pt_instructor

Glad to learn that the test brought you closer to a resolution. I'm not aware of any changes to the projection algorithms, but I'll see what I can come up with. I gather that your data is unchanged between the time when everything was working fine and when you started to notice display problems with these two layers.

HCCGISICT_

Paul you are correct, the two feature services remained unchanged for a period of months.

ChrisWhitmore

Hi Roy,

Would it be possible for you to send the exported shapefile to me at cwhitmore@esri.com? We'll be able to troubleshoot and reproduce the issue internally (data would be kept confidential).

Thanks,

Chris

Únete a la Conversación

Los miembros registrados pueden publicar, seguir actualizaciones y más. ¿Nuevo aquí? Regístrate gratis.

Enlaces Rápidos

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.