I was hoping for a recommendation or best practices for stacked points in regards to Medium Voltage Transformers and and Low Voltage Services as I cannot find an example in the Naperville Data.
1. I have SEVERAL locations with 3 - Single Phase Overhead Transformers (they are stacked). What I have done is created a line end at z value =0, changed the z value for each of my transformers to 1,2,&3. I then associated the transformers to a transformers bank AND to the Line end. My MV conductors has a z value of 0 to connect to the line end and my LV conductors has a z value to match the transformer it is connected too. Is this the best way of doing this or should I be spreading my transformers apart where they are not stacked and leaving them all at z value 0. I've found articles depicting them both ways, but can't seem to find a reasoning of which way is more effective or recommended standards.
2. I have SEVERAL location where I have a Low Voltage Conductor is coming to the end of the building. This building has MULTIPLE meters at this location so I have placed multiple Low Voltage Service Connections at this end point of the LV Conductor to represent each meter. Since they are stacked points I have changed the z values to 0,1,2,3 etc. However when you run the update subnetwork tool only the service connection with a 0 value gets the subnetwork name as there are not other associations in the place. I don't see a default associations to a line end or any other junction with the Service Connection to make this association to the LV Conductor Line. Is there another way of doing this or should I be making an association rule between a LV Junction Line End to LV Device Service Connection for my environment?
