Hi,
I've found in a couple of examples that using gdb as output in python toolboxes is much slower than standard files or shapefiles. Running in ArcPro 2.0.1
- Toolbox that has a function that needs arcpy.sa.sample output for further processing.
- output sample results to .dbf, read back into a dataframe, delete dbf - 6.5s
- output sample results to scratch gdb, which is cleaner, read back into df - 25s
- toolbox that outputs new feature classes
- outputs to shp - 5.19s
- outputs to gdb - 18.8s
In both cases the only difference in code is the storage in a gdb. Is anyone else seeing this performance issue using gdb storage?