In context of planning new grid, quite often in a cabled grid you will split a cable to insert and connect a new substation or cabinet.
Let's say we have cable with GlobalID ABC123 and you split it, you will have two cables left:
- One being the original cable feature with GlobalID ABC123 (the longest part)
- One being a new feature being assigned this GlobalID ABC456 (notice: a new feature yet NOT a new cable)
In planning context it is important to know that this new feature with GlobalID ABC456 is in fact not a new cable. The planner does not need to buy this cable nor do any digging (except at the location of the splitting).
I was wondering if using Arcade (or other magic approaches) I could identify such 'new' feature as 'new feature because of a split operation and hence in reality not really a new cable'.
Please notice enclosed freehand drawing aiming at delivering some context. The two green cables are NEW.
The BLUE feature is new (feature) but does not represent a new cable - how may I omit this from the budget.
Any ideas are welcomed.