Should the Flood sign be mapped ?

DEAF_PROBERT_68

Hello, 

I am very curious and came in my mind is that  if you have signs that show "Road May Flood" should be mapped ?

 I am wonder why was it not on either Google or Apple Maps  ?  I heard from someone on Facebook is that a driver got nearly stuck in the water .

If the Sign is up and stand up next to a road,  As a GIS Specialist or Road technician should be mapped them ?

That day it was on May 11 and we got heavy rain that day. We have roads that have dip down and a few of them are small and not deep but a few of them can be a bit slope deep a bit...

The picture is taken in Pueblo West, Colorado and we don't get very much heavy rain like you saw the picture... 

On my  Google or  Apple apps and when I check them, there are dry small stream through it and some do not shown stream through it

Here are the pictures ...

 

 

What do you think ?  It is all about safetly and prevent from people getting into the Flood and drown.

 

 

 

 

 

jcarlson

I say map everything! Something like "flood risk" would be a valuable part of a navigation network. No telling whether or not these features are in Google / Apple maps's networks, as those are closed-source, but it's common practice to add anything of this nature to OpenStreetMap using the hazard tag.

For the road in your example, I'd map the sign itself, to get its accurate position, but also add the hazard=flooding tag to the section of the highway feature as well. This still doesn't guarantee that the tag is actually used in a given routing tool, but the fact is it could be, and adding the feature enables hazard-aware routing.

Other tags, like hazard=animal_crossing or hazard=landslide can prompt a routing service to alert the user "In X miles, watch for falling rocks", "for the next X miles, be alert for animal crossings", that sort of thing.