The geonet content retention logic seems flawed. (cutting off as of a certain date and less than 100 views)
The (value of a post) is not the number of times it is viewed or age.
The (value of a post) is the value to the individual searching for it.
Behind the curtain of enterprise GIS their may only be a handful of people tasked with solving very specific complex issues.
Maybe 5,000 users viewed how to change the font size of a label.
Maybe 50 users had to figure out how to get out of tight spot with a broken enterprise GIS.
Having to e-mail geonet staff to (internally google) content does not seem very efficient as it adds time to finding solutions.
