nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Merging common fields

MeganSteva1

When merging two tables with a common field name but different lengths, i.e, string length 30 and string length 50, it defaults to the smaller string length, and your tables won't merge. It seems like it would be common sense to default to the larger length.

Finde mehr Beiträge mit dem Tag

Status: Öffnen

Kommentare

BradS

Yes, it looks like it's been a problem for a while:
http://forums.esri.com/thread.asp?t=249493&c=93&f=983&ESRISessionID=v_-hV8jd0aujLWsZ_WJ3mT99wIuI_fHFWUeBWffnUkG2rh5LAyXdP24iQXnxTsvuaukG5Q==

NatalieRobbins

Just want to comment that this is still an issue in ArcGIS Pro 2.4. Why does the tool not default to the larger string length?

Nehmen Sie an der Diskussion teil

Melden Sie sich an, um zu posten, Inhalte zu folgen und mehr. Neu hier? Kostenlos registrieren.