nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Angepasstes LGIM-Schema?

LarryGaudieri

<\/HEAD>

Ich frage mich, ob mir jemand helfen kann. Ich passe das standardmäßige LGIM an, das zusammen mit einem parcel fabric erstellt wurde, und möchte zusätzliche Domains oder Subtypen hinzufügen (es gibt zum Beispiel alle möglichen vermessenen Easements und Tracts), möchte diese Änderungen aber "neu verpacken", damit wir eine "Vorlagen"-Version für unsere Organisation besitzen. Kann mir jemand sagen, ob er etwas Ähnliches gemacht hat? <\/P><\/BODY><\/HTML>

Finde mehr Beiträge mit dem Tag

Accepted answers

stovernr

Thanks for the information. My first question is why you want to create new fabrics? Why not use versions of the original fabric. One way to save the schema of a database is to export your schema only out of that database and into the new database where the new fabric will be housed there will be some modifications to do when create a new fabric but it is doable. I have never tried saving out my parcel fabric symbology as a layer file. I am not sure how that would work. The easiest way I have found to preserve the changes to your symbology is to share your map document, and if you are on working versioned data you can then switch to that persons version, or you can save your symbology and recreate the layers in a new map.

It really comes down to personal preference,

Ryan

All comments

LarryGaudieri

Awesome...very helpful Ryan. I suspected as much but it's nice to validate it with experienced users too. I will only really be creating one additional new fabric dataset in a different geodatabase but wanted to be able to move the domain changes forward as well. Is that tool Export XML Workspace Document or is there another GP tool more specific? Thanks for your help Ryan.

stovernr

It really comes down to personal preference,

Ryan

LarryGaudieri

Thanks for your response Ryan. Yes...I want to "preserve" the modifications I've made so that I can repeatedly create a parcel fabric from scratch and have those be the default schema. Also, if I've made changes to the layer symbologies that come with the ESRI schema (when you create a parcel fabric), can I somehow preserve those (a layer package perhaps?)

stovernr

We have made many enhancements to the LGIM both in schema and data for the parcel fabric. By "re-packaging" do you mean data that the end users are using shares the same schema of the parcel fabric?

Ryan

Nimm an der Unterhaltung teil

Angemeldete Mitglieder können Beiträge verfassen, Updates folgen und mehr. Neu hier? Registriere ein kostenloses Konto.

Schnellzugriffe

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.