nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Hat jemand Dokumentation, die verschiedene von ESRI vorgeschlagene Architekturen vergleicht, in der die Vor- und Nachteile jeder einzelnen angegeben sind?

María_CristinaAlonso_Serrano

<\/HEAD>

In einem bestimmten Projekt habe ich eine Hochverfügbarkeitsinstallation im Active-Passive-Modus empfohlen, und man bittet mich, einen Vergleich zwischen verschiedenen ESRI-Technologie-Implementierungsarchitekturen bereitzustellen, um die vorgeschlagene Entscheidung zu rechtfertigen. Wissen Sie, ob diese Dokumentation bereits existiert?
Vielen Dank im Voraus<\/P><\/BODY><\/HTML>

Finde mehr Beiträge mit dem Tag

Architecture & Security

Accepted answers

All comments

Anonymous User

Duplicate question Does anyone have documentation comparing different GIS softwares? The idea is to present a comparison of software that allows to justify why I propose to use ESRI technology in a project - updated to not a duplicate following clarification.

María_CristinaAlonso_Serrano

Good afternoon Louise. Comparing different software and different architecture models are very different things to my understanding, in fact, I decided to separate the question so as not to mix concepts.
Can you explain to me why you have marked my two requests as outdated? There will be no way for anyone to support me if you do that, and if you know that this information is somewhere I would love you to show me.

Thank you so much

Anonymous User

Hi Maria, apologies it appeared that these two questions were similar. As you've clarified it seems like they are not so I'll remove the outdated and the question will appear as normal.

María_CristinaAlonso_Serrano

Thank you so much,

Do not forget to do it with both of them please, to find someone who could give some information about both subjects would help me immensely

Thanks

DerekLaw

Hi Maria,

> I have recommended a high availability installation in active-passive mode ... to provide a comparison between different ESRI technology implementation architectures to justify the proposed decision

Perhaps these help topics meet your needs:

Hope these help,

María_CristinaAlonso_Serrano

Thank you for your help, I know links which explain architectures what I need is a comparison between them but anyway thank you for your response

JonathanQuinn

The pros and cons should describe the advantages and disadvantages, which can be compared against each other. It can boil down to:

1) If this is a site in a single data center, do you want to federate? If yes, you need a multi-machine site. You can't set up active-passive environment and federate to Portal.

2) Do you have the expertise to manage a load balancer? If not, use the web adaptor. Consider that it's a single point of failure, unless you use DNS to set up redundancy.

You can look into geographic redundancy, which means you have two separate deployments, one active and one standby, and you're replicating content between the data centers.

These types of architectural discussions are a bit difficult to have via a Geonet post, as the topic can get quite complex.

María_CristinaAlonso_Serrano

Thank you very much, I have already created the documentation that I needed but this information is going to be very useful for me.
I really appreciate your help

Nimm an der Diskussion teil

Angemeldete Mitglieder können Beiträge verfassen, Updates folgen und mehr. Neu hier? Registriere ein kostenloses Konto.

Schnellzugriffe

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.