Just sitting in 'Python Across the ArcGIS Platform': big take away is they "have heard us" and the ability to update as opposed to re-create clones with Pro version updates in on the road map!
Dan Patterson
I agree, Luke, maintaining/updating user environments between Pro releases will end up creating more problems than it solves. I am also concerned one outcome might be Esri slowing down their adoption of new Python releases, which is already slow. I would much rather have the latest conda and Python versions and rebuild a user environment myself because as you mention, they are disposable and easily rebuilt.
Updating user environments on upgrade of Pro...? It's going to have potential for lots of issues - package versions, 3rd party channels. I treat conda envs as disposable, to be spun up and disposed of as required. It's a lot easier to build a fresh env than fix or update one.
What would really be useful is an updated conda.
good question... I will ask and go through the changelog to see why not
Release notes — conda 4.8.3.post67+586742cb documentation
Baby steps, I guess....
And, we are still stuck with Conda 4.3.x even though Conda 4.4.x was released 12/2017 and the current Conda version is 4.8.x.
Points raised on Beta .
The big disappointment for me is sticking with 3.6, meaning 3.7 (or probably 3.8) won't roll out until next year. Lots of cool/new stuff in the latest incarnations.
Angemeldete Mitglieder können Beiträge verfassen, Updates folgen und mehr. Neu hier? Registriere ein kostenloses Konto.
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.
