Incident Detector Processor 10.3 GeoEvent Definition

Question

In 10.3 the Incident Detector Processor GeoEvent Definition is grayed out. I was able to change the tags and column names before but now cannot. Is there a work around for this?

Thanks,

Larry Rover

GIS Director

RA Consultants

PhilipGlasner1 · Answer

Hi there,

I've had similar issues:

I recently upgraded to 10.3.1. I am using GeoEvent Processor with Portal for ArcGIS. My requirement is to update incidents in a hosted feature service. The attribute names of a hosted feature service are all converted to lowercase names, such as alerttype, because of Data Store using PostgreSQL DB. The GeoEvent definition incident uses alertType instead. So I copied the incident definition to a custom definition and altered the attributes name to match with those in the hosted feature service.

So, based on your advice RJ Sunderman​ I tried to use a Field Mapper processor to convert these names and it worked perfectly. Here's the according GeoEvent Service (it's in German though).

Thanks for this great question and advice,

Philip & Marko Einspieler​

LawrenceRover · Answer

RJ,

Additionally, I just tried using  the field mapper to change VehicleId to the name of id, trackId and note. This did not affect what the incident processor output in any way.  Let me know if there is anything that I am missing.

From: Larry Rover 
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015

Thanks for helping with the incident detector issue I was having. I was able to get the columns I needed for the incident detector by using the Field Mapper before the incident detector to reroute the data into the columns named in the incident detector's geoevent definition.

Larry Rover, GISP

Thanks,

Larry

LawrenceRover · Answer

RJ,

Thanks for the response. I have a custom input we use for vehicle data and the "id" field is named "DeviceId". Previously I would change that one field in the Geoevent Definition and it would work fine.

The reason I am doing this is we have an email alert going out if a column in our data reads "1" as an open condition and "0" to close the condition.  All what I am trying to do is have the "id"/"DeviceId" displayed in the body of the email.

Is there any other out of the box suggestions? I have not used the field mapper before either, how could that help with the above issue?

Thanks in advance.

Thanks,

Larry